Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Exchange-traded products in Germany: development and substitution of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded commodities and exchange-traded notes

Abstract

Research background: Exchange-traded products (ETPs) are one of the most rapidly growing categories of financial products. Their fast development has been boosted by innovative features. Three main categories of ETPs are exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). ETCs and ETNs remain least known, even though their number on some stock exchanges is high. In Europe, Germany is one of the largest and most active ETPs markets. ETCs and ETNs are debt instruments, in contrast with the most popular ETFs, which are equity securities. Therefore, they offer investors different advantages, but also expose them to other types of risks.

Purpose of the article: The key aim of the article is to present the features of ETPs and to provide in-depth insight into the issues linked with the development of ETPs market in Germany, with the special emphasis on the ETCs and ETNs.

Methods: In the main empirical part of the article, German ETPs market is analyzed using descriptive statistics and technological substitution framework (employed for the analysis of innovations in order to evaluate the changing market shares of, first, ETFs versus ETCs and ETNs, as well as, second, ETFs versus other types of investment funds). The period of the analysis is 2010?2016 in the former case and 2007?2016 in the latter.

Findings & Value added: Share of ETPs other than ETFs in the total market in Germany remains low. Even though the market position of the leading products, i.e. ETFs, is still very strong, some substitution has been observed, especially after 2015. Predictions indicate that this trend will continue in the upcoming years. The results of the analysis of the investment funds? market confirm the substitution between ETFs and traditional investment funds over 2007?2017, in particular in the first years of this time period.

Keywords

exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded products, financial innovations, stock exchange, Germany

PDF

References

  1. Abner, D. (2016). The ETF handbook. How to value and trade exchange-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119 297727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119297727
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Agapova, A. (2011). Conventional mutual index funds versus exchange-traded funds. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2). doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2010.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Aroskar, R., & Ogden, W. A. (2012). An analysis of exchange traded notes tracking errors with their underlying indexes and indicative values. Applied Financial Economics, 22(24). doi: 10.1080/09603107.2012.684787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.684787
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Blitz, D., Huij, J., & Swinkels, L. (2012). The performance of European index funds and exchange‐traded funds. European Financial Management, 18(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Charteris, A., Chau, F., Gavriilidis, K., & Kallinterakis, V. (2014). Premiums, discounts and feedback trading: evidence from emerging markets' ETFs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Frijns, B. (2017). Evaluating the tracking performance and tracking error of New Zealand exchange traded funds. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(3). doi: 10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0089
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Cherry, J. (2004). The limits of arbitrage: evidence from exchange traded funds. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=628061 (12.08.2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.628061
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Cserna, B., Levy, A., & Wiener, Z. (2013). Counterparty risk in exchange-traded notes (ETNs). Journal of Fixed Income, 23(1). doi: 10.3905/jfi.2013.23.1.076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2013.23.1.076
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Curcio, R. J., Lipka, J. M., & Thornton, Jr., J. H. (2004). Cubes and the individual investor. Financial Services Review, 13.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Czuderna, K., Riedel, C., & Wagner, N. (2015). Liquidity and conditional market returns: evidence from German exchange traded funds. Economic Modelling, 51. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.028
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Dannhauser, C. D. (2017). The impact of innovation: evidence from corporate bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Journal of Financial Economics, 125. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.002
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Deutsche Bank (2010). The race for assets in the European commodity exchange-traded products space. London.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Deutsche Bank (2015). European monthly ETF market review. London.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Deutsche Bank (2017). ETF annual review & outlook. London.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Elton, E., Gruber, M., Comer, G., & Li, K. (2002). Spiders: where are the bugs? Journal of Business, 75(3). doi:10.1086/339891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/339891
    View in Google Scholar
  16. ETFGI (2017). ETFGI global ETF and ETP industry highlights - December 2016. Retrieved from http://www.etfgi.com/publications/reports (22.03.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Ferri, R. (2009). The ETF book: the ETF book: all you need to know about exchange-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2012). Investor alerts exchange-traded notes — avoid unpleasant surprises. Retrieved from http://www.finra.org/in vestors/alerts/exchange-traded-notes-avoid-surprises (20.03.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, J. C., & Pry, R. H. (1972). A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80005-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80005-7
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Hill, J. M. (2013). The evolution and success of index strategies in ETFs. Financial Analyst Journal, 72(5). doi: 10.2469/faj.v72.n5.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v72.n5.2
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Hill, J. M., Nadig, D., Hougan, M., & Fuhr, D. (2015). A comprehensive guide to exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute Research Foundation.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Hilliard, J. (2017). Premiums and discounts in ETFs: an analysis of the arbitrage mechanism in domestic and international funds. Global Finance Journal, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2014.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2014.06.001
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Hull, I. (2016). The development and spread of financial innovations. Quantitative Economics, 7. doi:10.3982/QE521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE521
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Ivanov, S. I. (2016). Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 61. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Krause, T., & Tse, Y. (2013). Volatility and return spillovers in Canadian and U.S. industry ETFs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.009
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Kucharavy, D., & De Guio, R. (2011). Logistic substitution model and technological forecasting. Procedia Engineering, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.129
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Kwaśnicki, W. (2013). Logistic growth of the global economy and competitiveness of nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.007
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Lechman, E. (2015). ICT diffusion in developing countries. Towards a new concept of technological takeoff. Springer. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-18254-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18254-4
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2015). ICT technologies and financial innovations: the case of Exchange Traded Funds in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.006
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2018). Tracing financial innovation diffusion and substitution trajectories. Recent evidence on exchange-traded funds in Japan and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.003
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Lettau, M., & Madhavan, A. (2018). Exchange-Traded Funds 101 for Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.1257/jep.32.1.135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.1.135
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Leung, T., & Santoli, M. (2016). Leveraged exchange-traded funds: price dynamics and options valuation. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29094-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29094-2
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Lin, J.-C. (2016). Does the inverse exchange-traded fund trading convey a bearish signal to the market?. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(2-2). doi:10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.02
    View in Google Scholar
  34. MacManus, C., & Lee, J. (2017). The growth of ETFs in Europe. Performance Magazine, 22.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Madhavan, A. (2012). Exchange-traded funds, market structure, and the flash crash. Financial Analyst Journal, 68(4). doi: 10.2469/faj.v68.n4.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v68.n4.6
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Marchetti, C., & Nakicenovic, N. (1979). The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2013). ETF arbitrage: intraday evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin. 2013.05.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.05.014
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2018). Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin. 2018.02.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.02.011
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Marszk, A., Lechman, E., & Kaur, H. (2017). Financial markets diffusion patterns. The case of Mexican investment funds. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i1.5
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Meyer, P. S., Yung, J. W., & Ausubel, J. H. (1999). A primer on logistic growth and substitution: the mathematics of the Loglet Lab software. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61(3). doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00021-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00021-9
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Petajisto, A. (2017). Inefficiencies in the pricing of exchange-traded funds. Financial Analyst Journal, 73(1). doi: 10.2469/faj.v73.n1.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v73.n1.7
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Shank, C. A., & Vianna, A. C. (2016). Are US-Dollar-Hedged-ETF investors aggressive on exchange rates? A panel VAR approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.05.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2782082
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Vandermarliere, B., Ryckebusch, J., Schoors, K., Cauwelsc, P., & Sornette, D. (2017). Discrete hierarchy of sizes and performances in the exchange-traded fund universe. Physica A., 469. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.084
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Xetra (2017). Monthly statistics Cash Market. Retrieved from http://www.deuts che-boerse-cash-market.com/dbcm-en/instruments-statistics/statistics/cash-mar ket-statistics/monthly-statistics-cash-market (20.03.2017).
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Yiannaki, S. M. (2015). ETFs performance Europe - a good start or not? Procedia Economics and Finance, 30. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01346-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01346-5
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 254

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.