Sustainable development of regions in Ukraine: before and after the beginning of the conflict

Abstract

Research background: Sustainable development is the agenda for many countries including Ukraine, which adopted it at the national level and promoted through its regions. As the country is constantly struggling with the results of the military conflict and the impact of the occupation of its part by separatists, which led to economic decrease and emergence of numerous social and environmental issues, the transition of Ukraine to sustainable development path becomes especially important. At the same time, there is no official methodology adopted by the Ukrainian government, how to assess sustainable development of its regions. Availability of objective assessments would contribute to development of the relevant policy recommendations.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of the article is to assess sustainable development of the regions in Ukraine and to show the dynamics of performance of the regions before and after the beginning of the military conflict in the East of Ukraine.

Methods: We suggest the methodology of calculation of the integral index of sustainable development of the regions in Ukraine. This methodology takes into account the three pillars of sustainable development concept (economic, social and environmental) and uses the data available for all Ukrainian regions from the official statistics source. In order to determine the position of individual regions in the development of the Ukrainian economy and to identify certain groups of regions according to their level of sustainable development, we apply the method of statistical grouping.

Findings & Value added: The conducted analyses showed the dynamics of indicators of sustainable development of the Ukrainian regions, the performance of the regions and their affiliation to the corresponding attributive groups. The situation and interrelation of the regions in Ukraine totally changed after the beginning of the military conflict in the East of Ukraine. The Luhansk and Donetsk regions, which are directly affected by the military conflict, became the outsiders among other regions in Ukraine, though before the conflict the values of sustainable development indicators had been above the average values in Ukraine. The leaders among the regions also changed, and the difference between the leaders and the following groups became significant. The results of the analyses allowed to visualize the dynamics of sustainable development of the regions in Ukraine and define the key directions for future development.

Keywords

sustainable development, region, indicator, assessment, military conflict in the East of Ukraine

References

1. Allain, S., Plumecocq, G., & Leenhardt, D. (2018). Spatial aggregation of indicators in sustainability assessments: descriptive and normative claims. Land Use Policy, 76. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.038
   View in Google Scholar
2. Ameenab R. F. M., & Mourshed, M. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.020
   View in Google Scholar
3. Boldachev, A. (2009). Temporality. Retrieved from http://philosophystorm.org/ boldachev/1343 (15.10.2018).
   View in Google Scholar
4. Chromatic-temporal analysis of sustainable development of regions in Ukraine for 2008-2015. (2018, May 17).
   View in Google Scholar
5. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind. 2015.08.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
   View in Google Scholar
6. Kono, J., Ostermeyer, Y., & Wallbaum, H. (2018). Investigation of regional conditions and sustainability indicators for sustainable product development of building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018. 06.057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.057
   View in Google Scholar
7. Mascarenhas, A., Coelho, P., Subtil, E., & Ramos T. (2010). The role of common local indicators in regional sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicators, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.11.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.11.003
   View in Google Scholar
8. Millennium Development Goals Ukraine: 2000–2015. National report. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/dam/ukraine/docs/PR/2015%20 MDGs%20Ukraine%20Report%20engl.pdf (15.10.2018).
   View in Google Scholar
9. Ministry of economic development and trade of Ukraine (2017). Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. 2017 National baseline report. Retrieved from https://mfa.gov.ua/mediafiles/sites/poland/files/Sustainable_Development_Goals_Ukraine.pdf (15.10.2018).
   View in Google Scholar
10. Nesterenko, S. A. (2015). Otsinka staloho rozvytku Zaporizʹkoyi oblasti. Scientific Journal of Kherson State University, 10.
    View in Google Scholar
11. Raszkowski, A., & Bartniczak, B. (2018). Towards sustainable regional development: economy, society, environment, good governance based on the example of Polish regions. Transformations in Business & Economics, 17. doi: 10.3390/su11041180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041180
    View in Google Scholar
12. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2018). Statistical Information. Retrieved from http://ukrstat.gov.ua (01.10.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
13. Szopik-Depczyńskaa, K., Chebab, K., Bąkb, I., Stajniakc, M., Simbolid, A., & Ioppoloe, G. (2018). The study of relationship in a hierarchical structure of EU sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 90. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolind.2018.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.002
    View in Google Scholar
14. Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162
    View in Google Scholar
15. Omarov, Sh. A. (2014). Evaluation of sustainable development of regions of Ukraine. Problems of Economy, 3.
    View in Google Scholar
16. UNICEF (2014). Millennium development goals (MDG) monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/statistics/index_24304.html (01.10.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
17. United Nations (2018). Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/Global%20Indicator%20 Framework%20after%20refinement_Eng.pdf (01.10.2018).
    View in Google Scholar
18. Uskova, T. V. (2009). Upravleniye ustoychivym razvitiyem regiona. Retrieved from http://library.vscc.ac.ru/Files/books/12997391861753V.PDF.
    View in Google Scholar
19. Valenti, W. C., Kimpara, J. M., Pretoc, B. de L., & Moraes-Valenti, P. (2018) Indicators of sustainability to assess aquaculture systems. Ecological Indicators, 88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.068
    View in Google Scholar
20. Valentin, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00049-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00049-4
    View in Google Scholar
21. Wulf, C., Werker, J., Zapp, P., Schreiber, A., Schlör, H., & Kuckshinrichs, W. (2018). Sustainable development goals as a guideline for indicator selection in life cycle sustainability assessment. Procedia CIRP, 69. doi: 10.1016/j.procir. 2017.11.144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.144
    View in Google Scholar
22. Zhurovskyi, M. Z. (2009). Stalyy rozvytok rehioniv Ukrayiny. Retrieved from activity.wdc.org.ua/ukraine/Isd_ukr-2400dpi-10.pdf (01.10.2018).
    View in Google Scholar