Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Temporary contracts and Okun?s law in Poland

Abstract

Research background: The share of temporary workers in Poland is one of the largest of any EU country, which may affect the output unemployment relationship. The Polish case seems to be a natural experiment. Contrary to many advanced European countries, the spread of temporary contracts in Poland was not caused by labor market reform but instead resulted mainly from spontaneous processes.

Purpose of the article: This paper investigates the effect of the widespread use of temporary contracts on the relationship between output and unemployment in Poland.

Methods: The analysis is based on the ?dynamic? version of Okun?s law and uses OLS regression, OLS split-sample regression and OLS rolling regression. The sample period is 1996?2018.

Findings & Value added: The study found that unemployment?s sensitivity to output increased over time and was related to the greater use of temporary contracts, particularly among young people and women. Initially, at the turn of the 21st century, the expansion of temporary jobs changed the employment composition and had an insignificant effect on unemployment since firms mainly replaced permanent contracts with temporary contracts. Then, starting around 2006, temporary contracts began affecting unemployment levels and unemployment?s responsiveness to output. During this period, firms used temporary contracts as the main workforce adjustment device during the business cycle. 

Keywords

Okun’s law, temporary contracts, labor market, economic growth

PDF

References

  1. Arak, P., Lewandowski, P., & Żakowiecki, P. (2014). Dual labour market in Poland ? proposals for overcoming the deadlock. IBS Policy Paper, Warsaw, Institute for Structural Research (IBS), 1.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Ball, L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2012). Okun?s Law: Fit at 50? Paper presented at the 13th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference Hosted by the International Monetary Fund Washington DC, November 8?9, 2012.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Banerji, A., Lin, H., & Saksonovs, S. (2015). Youth unemployment in advanced Europe: Okun?s law and beyond. IMF Working Paper, 15/5. doi: 10.5089/9781 498382519.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498382519.001
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Baranowska, A., & Gebel, M. (2008). Temporary employment in Central- and Eastern Europe: Individual Risk Patterns and Institutional Context. MZES Working Papers, Mannheimer, 106.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bentolila, S., & Saint-Paul, G. (1992). The macroeconomic impact of flexible labor contracts, with an application to Spain. European Economic Review, 36(5). doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90043-V. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90043-V
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bentolila, S., Cahuc, P., Dolado, J.J., & Le Barbanchon, T. (2012). Two-tier labor markets in the great recession: France vs. Spain. Economic Journal, 122(562). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02534.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02534.x
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Boeri, T., & Garibaldi P,. (2007). Two tier reforms of employment protection: a honeymoon effect? Economic Journal, 117(521). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02060.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02060.x
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bukowski, M., Koloch G., & Lewandowski, P. (2007). Labour market macrostructure ? shocks and institutions. In M. Bukowski (Ed.). Employment in Poland 2007. Safety on the flexible labour market. Warszawa: Departament Analiz Ekonomicznych i Prognoz Ministerstwo Pracy i Polityki Społecznej.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Cahuc, P., Charlot O., & Malherbet F. (2016). Explaining the spread of temporary jobs and its impact on labor turnover. International Economic Review, 57(2). doi: 10.1111/iere.12167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12167
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Cappellari, L., Dell?Aringa, C., & Leonardi, M. (2012). Temporary employment in Italy. CESifo DICE Report, 1.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Cazes, S., Verick S., & Hussami, F. A. (2013). Why did unemployment respond so differently to the global financial crisis across countries? Insights from Okuns law. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2(10). doi: 10.1186/2193-9004-2-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-2-10
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Cevik, E. I., Dibooglu S., & Barisik, S. (2013). Asymmetry in the unemployment?output Relationship over the business cycle: evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies, 55(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2013.7
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Cichocki, S., Gradzewicz, M., & Tyrowicz, J. (2015). The responsiveness of employment to changes in GDP and the flexibility of labor market institutions in Poland. Gospodarka Narodowa, 278(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100832
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Costain, J., Juan, F., Jimeno, J.F., & Thomas, C. (2010). Employment fluctuations in a dual labor market. Banco de Espa?a Documentos de Trabajo, 1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1594782
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Cuaresma, J. C. (2003). Okun?s law revisited. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4). doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00056
    View in Google Scholar
  16. d'Agostino, G., Pieroni, L., & Scarlato. M. (2018). Evaluating the effects of labour market reforms on job flows: the Italian case. Economic Modelling, 68. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.011
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, R., Lim, G. C., & van Ours, J. C. (2017). Revisiting the Okun relationship. Applied Economics, 49(28). 2749?2765. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1245846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1245846
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Dunsch, S. (2016). Okun?s law and youth unemployment in Germany and Poland. International Journal of Management and Economics, 49(1). doi: 10.1515/ ijme-2016-0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2016-0003
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Elsby, M. W., Hobijn, B., & Sahin, A. (2010). The labor market in the great recession. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w15979
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Gajderowicz, T., Grotkowska, G., Wincenciak, L., & Wirtek, E. (2014). Unemployment rate sensitivity to GDP fluctuations across Polish voivodeships. Ekonomia, 39.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Gatti, R., Goraus, K., & Morgandi, M. (2014). Balancing flexibility and worker protection. Understanding labor market duality in Poland. Washington DC: The World Bank,.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Harris, R., & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun?s law: cross-country comparison. Economics Bulletin, 5(2).
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Hutengs, O., & Stadtmann, G. (2014). Don?t trust anybody over 30: youth unemployment and Okun?s law in CEE countries. Bank i Kredyt, 45(1).
    View in Google Scholar
  24. IMF (2010). Unemployment dynamic during recessions and recoveries: Okun?s law and beyond. World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing Growth, April.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Jimenez-Rodriguez, R., & Russo, G. (2012). Aggregate employment dynamics and partial labour market reforms. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00396.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00396.x
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Kahn, L. M. (2010). Employment protection reforms, employment and the incidence of temporary jobs in Europe: 1995?2001. Labour Economic, 17(1). doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.05.001
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Kiersztyn, A. (2016). Fixed-term employment and occupational position in Poland: the heterogeneity of temporary jobs. European Sociological Review, 32(6). doi: 10.1093/esr/jcw044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw044
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Knotek, E. (2007). How useful is Okun?s law? Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Fourth Quarter.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun?s law: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2). doi: 10.1016/S0164-0704.00)00135-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-0704(00)00135-X
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Lewandowski, P., Stroński, K., & Keister R. (2016). Labour market segmentation and pensions in Polish defined-contribution scheme. Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje, 33(2).
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Lewandowski, P., Góra, M., & Lis, M. (2017). Temporary employment boom in Poland ? a job quality vs . quantity trade-off ? IZA Discussion Paper Series, 11012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041808
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Lewandowski, P., & Magda, I. (2017). Temporary employment, unemployment and employment protection legislation in Poland. In A. Piasna & M. Myant (Eds.). Myths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. Brussels: ETUI.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Majchrowska, A., Mroczek K., & Tokarski T. (2013). Unemployment rate variations in Poland in 2002-2011. Gospodarka Narodowa, 265(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100946
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Nikulin, D., & Szymczak, S. (2020). Effect of the integration into Global Value Chains on the employment contract in Central and Eastern European countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.013
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: its measurement and significance. Reprinted as Cowles Foundation Paper, 190. Retrieved form http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/ P/cp/p01b/p0190.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Pilc, M. (2017). The temporary employed in Poland: beneficiaries or victims of the liberal labour market? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(3). doi: 10.117 7%2F0143831X15574113.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Saczuk, K. (2014). Labor Force Survey in Poland in the years 1995-2010. The correction of data. Materiały i Studia NBP, 301.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Soylu Ö. B., Çakmak, I., & Okur, F. (2018). Economic growth and unemployment issue: Panel data analysis in Eastern European Countries. Journal of International Studies, 11(1). doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/7
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Sögner, L., & Stiassny, A. (2002). An analysis on the structural stability of Okun?s law - A cross-country study. Applied Economics, 32(14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210124180
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Statistics Poland (2019). Labour force survey in Poland IV quarter 2018. Warsaw: Statistics Poland.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Statistics Poland. Poland - macroeconomic indicators. https://stat.gov.pl/en/poland-macroeconomic-indicators/.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Statistics Poland. Quarterly information on the labour market ? various years.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Virén, M. (2001). The Okun curve is non-linear. Economics Letters, 70(2). doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765.00)00370-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00370-0
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Wojciechowski, W. (2011). How to reduce the number of fixed-term contracts in Poland and strengthen the economic growth?. Analiza FOR, 7/2011.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Zanin, L. (2014). On Okun?s law in OECD countries: An analysis by age cohorts. Economics Letters, 125(2). doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.08.030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.08.030
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 409

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.