Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Enterprise ownership patterns in the least developed districts of Slovakia

Abstract

Research background: The literature overview shows a blank space regarding the effects of ownership on the determination of enterprises' spatial distribution. Various papers identify differences between determinants of the spatial distribution of foreign direct investments, exporters in foreign ownership, and domestically owned exporters; however, they mostly agree on the role of big cities, economic centres, and state of infrastructure as well as historical patterns.

Purpose of the article: The article focuses on the spatial distribution analysis of enterprise units from their owner's perspective on the empirical evidence from all 79 districts of the Slovak Republic. Special attention is given to the category of the least developed districts.

Methods: Within the presented article, the authors investigate the characteristics of the regional spatial distribution of business entities concerning standard ownership categories using the cluster analysis. The presented approach is twofold: firstly, the authors investigate the share of individual ownership types on the district level, and secondly, the number of enterprises by ownership categories is adjusted to 100,000 inhabitants. Cluster analysis and methods of spatial statistics are applied in both approaches.

Findings & value added: The main results show a relation between the district's inclusion into the group of the least developed districts and enterprise ownership characteristics in these districts mainly through the relative underrepresentation of the secluded inland, foreign and international types of ownership, as well as their geographical clustering. The results of the presented research can be used in policy-making targeting business activity in underdeveloped districts. At the same time, the results provide basis for limited theoretical generalisations based on a single-country case study with regard to principles of business ownership structures development.

Keywords

regional business structure, cluster analysis, spatial autocorrelation, ownership types, least developed districts

PDF

References

  1. Argent, N. (2017). Rural geography I: resource peripheries and the creation of new global commodity chains. Progress in Human Geography, 41(6), 803?812. doi: 10.1177/0309132516660656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516660656
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Ascani, A., Crescenzi, R., & Iammarino, S. (2016). Economic institutions and the location strategies of European multinationals in their geographic neighborhood. Economic Geography, 92(4), 401?429. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.117 9570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1179570
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Asmussen, Ch. G., Nielsen, B. B., Goerzen, A., & Tegtmeier, S. (2018). Global cities, ownership structures, and location choice foreign subsidiaries as bridgeheads. Competitiveness Review, 28(3), 252?276. doi: 10.1108/CR-09-2017-0063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2017-0063
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Baculáková, K. (2018). Cluster analysis of creative industries in the regions and districts of Slovakia. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 13(3), 74?89. doi: 10.207/26472537.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Baláž, V. (2004). Trends in the regional development of the Slovak Republic: economic theory and practice. Ekonomický časopis /Journal of Economics, 52(7), 783?800.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A., & Davé, R. N. (2004). Validating clusters using the Hopkins statistic. In 2004 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems ? proceedings, Budapest, Hungary. IEEE. 149?153. doi: 10.1109/FUZZY.2004.1375706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2004.1375706
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bentivogli, Ch., & Mirenda, L. (2017). Foreign ownership and performance: evidence from Italian firms. International Journal of the Economics and Business, 24(3), 251?273. doi: 10.1080/13571516.2017.1343542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2017.1343542
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Betáková, J., Havierniková, K., & Jašková, D. (2018). Potential for clustering in the agricultural sector assessment: the case of Slovakia. Economic Annals-XXI, 167(9-10), 23?27. doi: 10.21003/ea.V167-05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V167-05
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Blaszczyk, B., Hoshi, I., & Woodward, R. (Eds.) (2004). Secondary privatization in transition economies: the evolution of enterprise ownership in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovenia. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Brzica, D. (2005). Analysis of corporate governance and ownership change process in Slovak Republic. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics, 53(1), 63?79.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Chomjaková, M., Suchý, M., Kožiak, R., & Daxnerová, M. (2016). Region clustering in the Slovak Republic from the sustainable development point of view. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.). 19th international colloquium on regional sciences: conference proceedings, Čejkovice, Czech Republic. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 42?49. doi: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-21
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Coe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Introduction: global production networks ? debates and challenges. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 267?269. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn006
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Coe, N., & Yeung, H. (2015). Global production networks: theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703907.001.0001
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. C. (2019). Global production networks: mapping recent conceptual developments. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 775?801. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbz018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz018
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Dudáš, T., & Grančay, M. (2019). Regional structure of foreign direct investment in Slovakia - a district-level gravity-type model. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics, 67(8), 811?836.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Elekes, Z., Boschma, R, & Lengyel, B. (2019). Foreign-owned firms as agents of structural change in regions. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1603?1613. doi: 10.108 0/00343404.2019.1596254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1596254
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Fabuš, M. (2015). Impact of foreign direct investment on unemployment development in selected regions of Slovak Republic. Economic Annals-XXI, 155(11?12), 63?66.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Fabuš, M., & Csabay, M. (2018). State aid and investment: case of Slovakia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 480?488. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018 .6.2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(1)
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Filatotchev, I., Lien, Y. C., & Piesse, J. (2005). Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22, 257?283. doi: 10.1007/S10490-005-3569-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-3569-2
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Frigant, V., & Zumpe, M. (2014). Are automotive global production networks becoming more global? Comparison of regional and global integration processes based on auto parts trade data. In Cahiers du GREThA, n°2014-09. Bordeaux: Université de Bordeaux.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Frydman, R., Gray, Ch., Hessel, M., & Rapaczynski, A. (1999). When does privatization Work? The impact of private ownership on corporate performance in the transition economies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1153?1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556241
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Gagliardi, L., & Iammarino, S. (2018). Innovation in risky markets: ownership and location advantages in the UK regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(5), 1177?1201. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lby033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby033
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Gamba, V., & Montanaro, L. (2009). Does internationalisation emerge from accounting documents? A survey among piedmont firms. In D. Vrontis, Y. Weber, R. Kaufman & S. Tarba (Eds.). Managerial and entrepreneurial developments in the Mediterranean area. 2nd annual EuroMed conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business. Salerno: University of Salerno, 665?684.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Gavurová, B., Soltés, M., & Kováč, V. (2017). Application of cluster analysis in process of competitiveness modelling of Slovak Republic regions. Transformations in Business and Economics, 16(3), 129?147.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Gelfand, A. E., Diggle, P., Guttorp, P., & Fuentes, M. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press of Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420072884
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Greenacre, M. (2018). Compositional data analysis in practice. CRC Press of Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429455537
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2002). Clustering validity checking methods: part II. ACM SIGMOD Record, 31(3), 19?27. doi: 10.1145/60185 8.601862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/601858.601862
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Hansmann, H. (2000). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Hecht, V. (2017). Location choice of German multinationals in the Czech Republic. Economics of Transition, 25(4), 593?623. doi: 10.1111/ecot.12131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12131
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Horobet, A. (2018). Foreign versus locally-owned companies: an analysis of post-crisis performance in Eastern Europe. In M. B. Beros, N. Recker & M. Kozina (Eds.). Book of proceedings: 27th international scientific conference on economic and social development, Rome, Italy. Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency. 486?496.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Ivanova, I., Strand, O., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). What is the effect of synergy provided by international collaborations on regional economies? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(1), 18?34. doi: 10.1007/s13132-017-0480-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0480-2
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Jaura, Z. (1996). On municipal ownership in the Slovak economy. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics, 44(9), 677?695.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Jungbluth, C., Rytter Sunesen, E., May, M. M., & Brown, J. (2020). Economic impact of foreign-owned firms in the EU and Germany. Policy brief No. 2020/02. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Kanó, I. S., Lengyel, B., Elekes, Z., & Lengyel, I. (2019). Agglomeration, foreign firms and firm exit in regions under transition: the increasing importance of related variety in Hungary. European Planning Studies, 27(22), 2099?2122. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1606897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1606897
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Kano, L., Tsang, E. W. K., & Yeung H. W. (2020). Global value chains: a review of the multi-disciplinary literature. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 577?622. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00304-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00304-2
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Kološta, S. (2016). Investigation of regional disparities in Slovakia in pre-crisis and crisi period. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.) 19th international colloquium on regional sciences: conference proceedings, Čejkovice, Czech Republic. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. 82?89. doi: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-201 6-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-9
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Korec, P., Ondoš, S., & Rusnák, J. (2016): Regionálne disparity na Slovensku; niekoľko poznámok k ich bádaniu. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae, 60(2), 257?293.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Kotíková, S. (2019). Potential of the Czech business environment assumes the effect of foreign direct investment. E & M Economics and Management, 22(4), 18?35. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-002
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Kuzmišinová, V., & Kuzmišin, P. (2015). Cluster potential in Slovak regions in the context of business environment's quality. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 10(2), 52?65.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Landesmann, M., & Stöllinger, R. (2018). Structural change, trade and global production networks. Policy notes and reports No. 21. Vienna: WIIW.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Li, S., Angelino, A., Yin, H., & Spigarelli, F. (2017). Determinants of FDI localization in China: a county-level analysis for the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14090985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14090985
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Martín-Fernández, J. A., Barceló-Vidal, C., & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (1998). A critical approach to non-parametric classification of compositional data. In A. Rizzi, M. Vichi & H. H. Bock (Eds.). Advances in data science and classification. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Berlin: Springer. 49?56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-72253-0_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72253-0_7
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Meluzi?n, T., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A. P., Pietrzak, M. B., & Doubravsky?, K. (2021). Institutional settings and their impact on the IPO activity: an exploratory study based on qualitative modelling. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 18(2), 215?235. doi: 10.12700/APH.18.2.2021.2.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.18.2.2021.2.12
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic (2019). Správa o stave podnikateľského prostredia. Bratislava: Ministerstvo hospodárstva SR 2019.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Nazarczuk, J. M., & Krajewska, A. (2018). Spatial concentration of foreign owned entities in Poland. Geographia Polonica, 91(4), 413?426. doi: 10.7163/GPol.0 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0128
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Nazarczuk, J. M., Uminski, S., & Brodzicki, T. (2020). Determinants of the spatial distribution of exporters in regions: the role of ownership. Annals of Regional Science, 64, 547?574. doi: 10.1007/s00168-019-00947-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00947-6
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Nxazonke, B., & van Wyk, R. B. (2020). The role of foreign direct investment (FDI) on domestic entrepreneurship in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 37(4), 587?600. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2019.1667751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2019.1667751
    View in Google Scholar
  48. OECD (2015). State-owned enterprise governance: a stocktaking of government rationales for enterprise ownership. Paris: OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239944-en
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Palatková, M. (2013): Mezinárodní turismus. Praha: Grada.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Pauhofová, I., & Stehlíková, B. (2018). Identifying the relationship between unemployment and wage development in the Slovak Republic. Ekonomický časopis / Journal of Economics, 66(5), 503?521.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (2003). Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: the importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 27?55. doi: 10.1023/A:1022480016567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022480016567
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Plešivčák, M., & Buček, J. (2017). In the centre, but still on the periphery. Is there any room for development of socio-economically deprived region in Slovakia? International Journal of Social Economics, 44(11), 1539?1558. doi: 10.1108/I JSE-01-2016-0023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-01-2016-0023
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
    View in Google Scholar
  54. R Core Team (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Rupasingha, A. (2017). Local business ownership and local economic performance: evidence from US counties. Regional Studies, 51(5), 659?673. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1119264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1119264
    View in Google Scholar
  56. SBA (2019a). Malé a stredné podnikanie v číslach v roku 2018. Bratislava: Slovak Business Agency.
    View in Google Scholar
  57. SBA (2019b). Správa o stave malého a stredného podnikania v Slovenskej republike v roku 2018. Bratislava: Slovak Business Agency.
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Seňová, A., & Antošová, M. (2014). Classification of sources of companies financing in Slovakia through cluster analysis using. International Journal of Interdisciplinarity in Theory and Practice, 5, 81?85.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Sun, L. (2003). Ownership and governance of enterprises. Recent innovative developments. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781403943903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403943903
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Szent-Iványi, B. (Ed.). (2017). Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40496-7
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Tang, D. (2017). The determinants of European Union (EU) foreign direct investments in the EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe during 1994?2012. Comparative Economic Research, 20(1), 75?99. doi: 10.1515/cer-2017-0005.
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Tang, R. W. (2019). FDI expansion speed of state-owned enterprises and the moderating role of market capitalism: evidence from China. International Business Review, 28(6), 101596. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101596
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Thompson, P., & Zang, W. Y. (2016). Foreign business ownership and domestic entrepreneurial exports. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(3), 873?895. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-10-2015-0138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2015-0138
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Thompson, P., & Zang, W. Y. (2018). The foreign business and domestic enterprise relationship: its implications for local entrepreneurial resilience. Local Economy, 33(1), 10?39. doi: 10.1177/0269094218756817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218756817
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Yi, J., Hong, J., Hsu, W., Ch., & Wang, Ch. (2017). The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China. Technovation, 62?63, 4?13. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation. 2017.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.002
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Zinecker, M., Skalická, M., Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2021a). Business angels in the Czech Republic: characteristics and a classification with policy implications. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1331 677X.2021.1890179.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Zinecker, M., Skalicka?, M., Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2021b). Identifying the impact of external environment on business angel activity. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraz?ivanja. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/ 1331677X.2021.1888140.
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 448

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.