Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Equity crowdfunding IPOs: Under or overpricing? The case of Poland as an example of quickly catching up economy

Abstract

Research background: The majority of research on equity crowdfunding concerns its evolution in developed countries. There are still relatively few works devoted to equity crowdfunding in developing regions, including Poland. Taking this into account and the lack of research on the effectiveness of ECF-based IPOs, there is a research gap that this article is trying to fill. This paper also contributes to the extensive literature dealing with the occurrence of the IPO underpricing phenomenon and focuses on a regional study on IPO underpricing in the still niche ECF-based IPOs.

Purpose of the article: The article aims to show the development of equity crowdfunding in Poland. The article also aims to (i) evaluate the effectiveness of debuts of companies that raised funds (and thus carried out their IPOs) using ECF platforms, and (ii) find the determinants of ECF-based IPOs performance.

Methods: The model for testing the potential determinants of ECF-based IPO performance is based on univariate linear regressions measuring the relationship between a dependent variable which stands for ECF-based IPO underpricing and one independent variable (chosen from a set of potential explanatory variables.

Findings & value added: The article shows that since 2020 ECF has become an important source of financing for listed SMEs in Poland. Based on the stylized fact on the risk-return tradeoff, it is assumed that ECF-based IPOs are more underpriced than IPOs of other companies to attract investors. The paper revealed that the effectiveness of ECF-based IPOs has mainly the cyclical nature and it depends on the stock price cycle. ECF-based IPOs are more underpriced then other IPOs only in the bull market while in the bear market they are more overpriced. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first study to explore the performance of ECF-based IPOs. Although this paper focuses on Poland, it opens the potential for broader global research in this area. The article can also hold significant practical value for all participants of the ECF market.

Keywords

equity crowdfunding, digitalization in finance, FinTech, IPO underpricing, IPO overpricing, NewConnect

PDF

References

  1. Ahlers, G. K., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Antal (2024). Fintech industry in Warsaw. Antal report for the city of Warsaw 2023. Retrieved from https://en.antal.pl/insights/report/fintech-industry-in-warsaw ?_gl=1*1js1mqe*_gcl_au*MTA2NDcwNjU1MC4xNzEyMTU2MDgx (22.03.2024).
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Allen, F., & Faulhaber, G. R. (1989). Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 303–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Balboni, B., Gualandri, E., Kocollari, U., Pedrazzoli, A., & Venturelli, V. (2018). A multidimensional approach to equity crowdfunding: Bridging the equity gap and boosting social capital. In M. García-Olalla & J. Clifton (Eds.). Contemporary issues in banking: Regulation, governance and performance (pp. 389–407). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90294-4_17
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bartling, B., & Park, A. (2010). How syndicate short sales affect the informational efficiency of IPO prices and underpricing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(2), 441–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109010000128
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Best, J., Lambkin, A., Neiss, S., Raymond, S., & Swart, R. (2013). Crowdfunding's potential for the developing world. InfoDev. Washington. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/409841468327411701/pdf/84000WP0Box380crowdfunding0study00.pdf (22.06.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bi, G., & Lu, J. (2023). Can an early exit mechanism attract more pledges in equity-based crowdfunding? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104166
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bian, Y., Hu, T., Liu, H., Su, W., & Wang, R. (2024). The JOBS Act and IPO underpricing. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 70, 102080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102080
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Blaseg, D., Cumming, D., & Koetter, M. (2021). Equity crowdfunding: High-quality or low-quality entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(3), 505–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899427
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Boeh, K., & Dunbar, C. (2016). Underwriter deal pipeline and the pricing of IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 120(2), 383–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.08.018
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Block, J., Hornuf, L., & Moritz, A. (2018). Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? Small Business Economics, 50(1), 3–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9876-4
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Bradford, C. S. (2012). Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws. College of Law, Faculty Publications. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/ 17266206.pdf (11.10.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Boulton, T. J., Smart, S. B., & Zutter, C. J. (2020). Worldwide short selling regulations and IPO underpricing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101596
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Butler, A. W., Keefe, M. O. C., & Kieschnick, R. (2014). Robust determinants of IPO underpricing and their implications for IPO research. Journal of Corporate Finance, 27, 367–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.06.002
    View in Google Scholar
  15. CCAF, World Bank & World Economic Forum (2022). The global Covid-19 fintech market impact and industry resilience report. University of Cambridge, World Bank Group and the World Economic Forum.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Chan, C. S., & Parhankangas, A. (2017). Crowdfunding innovative ideas: How incremental and radical innovativeness influence funding outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 237–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12268
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Chaplinsky , S., Hanley , K., & Moon, K. (2017). The JOBS Act and the costs of going public. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(4), 795–836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12172
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Chemmanur, T. J., Hu, G., & Huang, J. (2010). The role of institutional investors in initial public offerings. Review of Financial Studies, 23(12), 4496–4540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq109
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Chan, Y. C. (2014). How does retail sentiment affect IPO returns? Evidence from the internet bubble period. International Review of Economics & Finance, 29, 235–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.05.016
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Chen, Y., Goyal, A., & Zolotoy, L. (2022). Global board reforms and the pricing of IPOs. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(6), 2412–2443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109021000223
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Chen, Y., Wang, S. S., Li, W., & Tong, W. H. S. (2015). Institutional environment, firm ownership, and IPO first-day returns: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 150–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.03.002
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Coakley, J., & Lazos, A. (2021). New developments in equity crowdfunding: A review. Review of Corporate Finance, 1(3-4), 341–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/114.00000008
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Coakley, J., Lazos, A., & Liñares-Zegarra, J. (2022a). Strategic entrepreneurial choice between competing crowdfunding platforms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1794–1824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09891-0
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Coakley, J., Lazos, A., & Liñares-Zegarra, J. M. (2022b). Seasoned equity crowdfunded offerings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 77(C). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101880
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Correia, S., Sousa, M., & Brandão, E. (2024). What do we know about the choices of entrepreneurs before the equity crowdfunding campaign?. Small Business Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00868-x
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Cox, J., Nguyen, T., & Rich, J. (2019). Invest or regret? An empirical investigation into funding dynamics during the final days of equity crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 784–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.011
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Cressy, R. (2012). Funding gaps. In D. Cumming (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurial finance (pp. 255–304). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391244.013.0010
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Cumming, D. J., Johan, S., & Reardon, R. (2023). Governance and success in US securities-based crowdfunding. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.14407abstract
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Cumming, D. J., Martinez-Salgueiro, A., Reardon, R. S., & Sewaid, A. (2022). COVID-19 bust, policy response, and rebound: Equity crowdfunding and P2P versus banks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1825–1846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09899-6
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Cumming, D., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2021). Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance?. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 533–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00188-z
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Dicle M. F., & Levendis J. (2018). IPO activity and market volatility. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 7(1), 2–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-D-17-00017
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Duong, H. N., Goyal, A., Kallinterakis, V., & Veeraraghavan, M. (2022). Democracy and the pricing of initial public offerings around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(1), 322–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.07.010
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Edwards, A. K., & Hanley, K. W. (2010). Short selling in initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 21–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.010
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Estrin, S., Gozman, D., & Khavul, S. (2018). The evolution and adoption of equity crowdfunding: Entrepreneur and investor entry into a new market. Small Business Economics, 51, 425–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0009-5
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Estrin, S., & Khavul, S. (2016). Equity crowdfunding and the socialisation of entrepreneurial finance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, 13036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.13036abstract
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Ewens, M., & Farre-Mensa, J. (2022). Private or public equity? The evolving entrepreneurial finance landscape. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 271–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-101821-121115
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Festel, G., Wuermseher, M., & Cattaneo, G. (2013). Valuation of early stage high-tech start-up companies. International Journal of Business, 18(3), 216–231.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Li, F. (2001). Underpricing of foreign and domestic IPOs in the US market: Empirical evidence. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 10(1), 1–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0416.00040
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Hagedorn, A., & Pinkwart, A. (2016). The financing process of equity-based crowdfunding: An empirical analysis. In D. Brüntje & O. Gajda (Eds.). Crowdfunding in Europe. State of the art in theory and practice (pp. 71–85). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/0.1007/978-3-319-18017-5_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18017-5_5
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Harper, S. C. (2006). Extraordinary entrepreneurship: The professional's guide to starting an exceptional enterprise. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Helwege, J., & Liang, N. (2004). Initial public offerings in hot and cold markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(3), 541–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004026
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Hervé, F., Manthé, E., Sannajust, A., & Schwienbacher, A. (2019). Determinants of individual investment decisions in investment-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(5–6), 762–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12372
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Hornuf, L., Schilling, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2019). Are equity crowdfunding investors active investors?. Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, 19-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474190
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Hornuf, L., Schilling, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2022). The relevance of investor rights in crowdinvesting. Journal of Corporate Finance, 77, 101927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101927
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Hornuf, L., Schmitt, M., & Stenzhorn, E. (2018). Equity crowdfunding in Germany and the UK: Follow-up funding and firm failure. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 26(5), 331–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12260
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Hornuf, L., & Schwienbacher, A. (2017). Market mechanisms and funding dynamics in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 556–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.08.009
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Hornuf, L., Stenzhorn, E., & Vintis, T. (2022). Are sustainability-oriented investors different? Evidence from equity crowdfunding. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(6), 1662–1689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09896-9
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Huang, H., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Investors’ attention and overpricing of IPO: An empirical study on China’s growth enterprise market. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16(4), 761–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0351-1
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Hughes, P. J., & Thakor, A. V. (1992). Litigation risk, intermediation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Review of Financial Studies, 5(4), 709–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/5.4.709
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Hurt, C. (2015). Pricing disintermediation: Crowdfunding and online auction IPOs. University of Illinois Law Review, 2015(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2406205
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Karlis, P. L. (2000). IPO underpricing. Park Place Economist, 8(1), 81–89.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Kleinert, S., Bafera, J., Urbig, D., & Volkmann, C. K. (2021). Access denied: How equity crowdfunding platforms use quality signals to select new ventures. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 46(6), 1626–1657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211011945
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Le Pendeven, B., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Equity crowdfunding: The influence of perceived innovativeness on campaign success. British Journal of Management, 34(1), 280–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12585
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Li, W., Rhee, G., & Wang, S. S. (2017). Differences in herding: Individual vs. institutional investors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 45, 174–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.11.005
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Liu, L. X., Lu, R., Sherman, A. E., & Zhang, Y. (2023). IPO underpricing and limited attention: Theory and evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 154, 106932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106932
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Ljungqvist, A. P., & Wilhelm, W. J. (2002). IPO allocations: Discriminatory or discretionary? Journal of Financial Economics, 65(2), 167–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00138-1
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Lowry, M., Michaely, R., & Volkova, E. (2017). Initial public offerings: A synthesis of the literature and directions for future research. Foundations and Trends in Finance, 11(3-4), 154–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000050
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Lowry, M., & Shu, S. (2002). Litigation risk and IPO underpricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 309–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00144-7
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Lukkarinen, A., & Schwienbacher, A. (2023). Secondary market listings in equity crowdfunding: The missing link?. Research Policy, 52(1), 104648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104648
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Łukowski, M., & Zygmanowski, P. (2019). The role of crowdfunding in reducing the equity gap in Poland. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 81(3), 185–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2019.81.3.12
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Meluzín, T., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2018). Why do companies stay private? Determinants for IPO candidates to consider in Poland and the Czech Republic. Eastern European Economics, 56(6), 471–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2018.1496795
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Mason, C., Botelho, T., & Zygmunt, J. (2017). Why business angels reject investment opportunities: Is it personal?. International Small Business Journal, 35(5), 519–534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616646622
    View in Google Scholar
  63. McKenny, A. F., Allison, T. H., Ketchen, D. J., Short, J. C., & Ireland, R. D. (2017). How should crowdfunding research evolve? A survey of the entrepreneurship theory and practice editorial board. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 291–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12269
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1151–1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03317.x
    View in Google Scholar
  65. OECD (2010). SMEs, entrepreneurship, and innovation. OECD studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/smes-entrepreneurship-and-innovation_9789264080355-en (10.06.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264080355-en
    View in Google Scholar
  66. OECD (2023). OECD economic surveys: Poland 2023, OECD Publishing, Paris.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.25448
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Patatoukas, P. N., Sloan, R. G., & Wang, A. Y. (2022). Valuation uncertainty and short-sales constraints: Evidence from the IPO aftermarket. Management Science, 68(1), 608–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3900
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Piatkowski, M. (2018). Europe's growth champion: Insights from the economic rise of Poland. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789345.001.0001
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Plotnicki, M., & Szyszka, A. (2014). IPO market timing. The evidence of the disposition effect among corporate managers. Global Finance Journal, 25(1), 48–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2014.03.005
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Purnanandam, A. K., & Swaminathan, B. (2004). Are IPOs really underpriced?. Review of Financial Studies, 17(3), 811–848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg055
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Rathnayake, D. N., Louembe, P. A., Kassi, D. F., Sun, G., & Ning, D. (2019). Are IPOs underpriced or overpriced? Evidence from an emerging market. Research in International Business and Finance, 50, 171–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.04.013
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Ritter, J. R. (1998). Initial public offerings. Contemporary Finance Digest, 2(1), 5–30.
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), 187–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Rossi, A., Vismara, S., & Meoli, M. (2019). Voting rights delivery in investment-based crowdfunding: A crossplatform analysis. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(2), 251–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-018-0109-x
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Rossovski, J., Lucey, B. M., & Helbing, P. (2022). Determinants of negative first-day IPO returns. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4206271
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Salerno, D., Sampagnaro, G., & Verdoliva, V. (2022). Fintech and IPO underpricing: An explorative study. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102071
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Schenk, A. (2015). Crowdfunding in the context of traditional financing for innovative SMEs. In European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 636-643). Academic Conferences International Limited.
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Schwienbacher, A. (2019). Equity crowdfunding: Anything to celebrate? Venture Capital, 21(1), 65–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2018.1559010
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Signori, A., & Vismara, S. (2018). Does success bring success? The post-offering lives of equity-crowdfunded firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 575–591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.10.018
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Stanko, M. A., & Henard, D. H. (2017). Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Research Policy, 46(4), 784–798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Śliwiński, P. P. (2022). Economic divergence between Poland and Ukraine from the perspective of their balances of payments. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 72, 68–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2022.4.4
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Śliwiński, P. P., Ablewski, S., Gemra, K., & Łukowski, M. (2022). Where is the missing value? Evidence from the game industry IPOs underpricing in Poland. International Journal of Management and Economics, 58(4), 335–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2022-0024
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Tennakoon, N., & Siriwardhana, T. P. (2021). Fuelling the start-ups: Nexus of crowdfunding awareness, perceived parental influence, and internet familiarity on start-up intention. Sri Lanka Journal of Economic Research, 9(1), 3–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/sljer.v9i1.153
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Troise, C., & Tani, M. (2021). Exploring entrepreneurial characteristics, motivations and behaviours in equity crowdfunding: Some evidence from Italy. Management Decision, 59(5), 995–1024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1431
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Trzebiński, A. (2022). Crowdfunding udziałowy 3.0. Związek Przedsiębiorców Finansowych w Polsce. Retrieved from https://zpf.pl/pliki/raporty/raport-crowdfunding-udzialowy_2021.pdf (10.06.2022).
    View in Google Scholar
  87. UKNF (2022). Rynek ofert publicznych akcji oraz dłużnych papierów wartościowych w Polsce w 2021 r.. Retrieved from https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Rynek_ofert_publicznych_akcji_oraz_dluznych_papierow_wartosciowych_w_Polsce_w_2021.pdf (10.06.2022).
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Van Bommel, J., & Vermaelen, T. (2003). Post-IPO capital expenditures and market feedback. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(2), 275–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00249-7
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Vanacker, T., Vismara, S., & Walthoff-Borm, X. (2019). What happens after a crowdfunding campaign? In H. Landström, A. Parhankangas & C. Mason (Eds.). Handbook of research on crowdfunding (pp. 227–248). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117210.00015
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Vismara, S. (2016). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 579–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Vismara, S. (2018). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(3), 467–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12261
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Vismara S. (2019). Sustainability in equity crowdfunding. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 141(C), 98–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.014
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Vu, A. N., & Christian, J. (2024). UK equity crowdfunding success: The impact of competition, Brexit and Covid‐19. British Journal of Management, 35(1), 321–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12714
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Walthoff-Borm, X., Vanacker, T., & Collewaert, V. (2018). Equity crowdfunding, shareholder structures, and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(5), 314–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12259
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Wang, W., Mahmood, A., Sismeiro, C., & Vulkan N.(2019). The evolution of equity crowdfunding: Insights from co-investments of angels and the crowd. Research Policy, 48(8), 103727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.003
    View in Google Scholar
  96. Wilson, N., Wright, M., & Kacer, M. (2018). The equity gap and knowledge-based firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 626–649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.008
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Wong, E. S., Wb, R. W., & Ting, L. S. (2017). Initial public offering (IPO) underpricing in Malaysian settings. Journal of Economic & Financial Studies, 5(02), 14–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v5i02.276
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Zhang, Y., Hughes, M., Fu, K., Scholes, L., & Tang, F. (2023a). The effect of lead investors’ trustworthiness on funding performance: The moderating effect of investment-specific human capital. Technology in Society, 73, 102222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102222
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Zhang, Z., & Neupane, S. (2024). Global IPO underpricing during the Covid-19 pandemic: The impact of firm fundamentals, financial intermediaries, and global factors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102954
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Zhang, Y., Scholes, L., Fu, K., Hughes, M., & Tang, F. (2023b). Equity crowdfunding syndicates and fundraising performance: The effect of human capital and lead investor reputation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(4), 645–666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-06-2022-0282
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 72

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.