Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Generative artificial intelligence of things systems, multisensory immersive extended reality technologies, and algorithmic big data simulation and modelling tools in digital twin industrial metaverse

Abstract

Research background: Multi-modal synthetic data fusion and analysis, simulation and modelling technologies, and virtual environmental and location sensors shape the industrial metaverse. Visual digital twins, smart manufacturing and sensory data mining techniques, 3D digital twin simulation modelling and predictive maintenance tools, big data and mobile location analytics, and cloud-connected and spatial computing devices further immersive virtual spaces, decentralized 3D digital worlds, synthetic reality spaces, and the industrial metaverse.

Purpose of the article: We aim to show that big data computing and extended cognitive systems, 3D computer vision-based production and cognitive neuro-engineering technologies, and synthetic data interoperability improve artificial intelligence-based digital twin industrial metaverse and hyper-immersive simulated environments. Geolocation data mining and tracking tools, image processing computational and robot motion algorithms, and digital twin and virtual immersive technologies shape the economic and business management of extended reality environments and the industrial metaverse.

Methods: Quality tools: AMSTAR, BIBOT, CASP, Catchii, R package and Shiny app citationchaser, DistillerSR, JBI SUMARI, Litstream, Nested Knowledge, Rayyan, and Systematic Review Accelerator. Search period: April 2024. Search terms: “digital twin industrial metaverse” + “artificial Intelligence of Things systems”, “multisensory immersive extended reality technologies”, and “algorithmic big data simulation and modelling tools”. Selected sources: 114 out of 336. Published research inspected: 2022–2024. PRISMA was the reporting quality assessment tool. Dimensions and VOSviewer were deployed as data visualization tools.

Findings & value added: Simulated augmented reality and multi-sensory tracking technologies, explainable artificial intelligence-based decision support and cloud-based robotic cooperation systems, and ambient intelligence and deep learning-based predictive analytics modelling tools are instrumental in augmented reality environments and in the industrial metaverse. The economic and business management of the industrial metaverse necessitates connected enterprise production and big data computing systems, simulation and modelling technologies, and virtual reality-embedded digital twins.

Keywords

generative artificial intelligence of things, multisensory immersive extended reality, big data, digital twin, industrial metaverse

PDF

References

  1. Agarwal, A., & Alathur, S. (2023). Metaverse revolution and the digital transformation: Intersectional analysis of Industry 5.0. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17, 688‒707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2023-0036
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Alimam, H., Mazzuto, G., Tozzi, N., Ciarapica, F. E., & Bevilacqua, M. (2023). The resurrection of digital triplet: A cognitive pillar of human‒machine integration at the dawn of Industry 5.0. Journal of King Saud University ‒ Computer and Information Sciences, 35(10), 101846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101846
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Al-Qaysi, N., Iranmanesh, M., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Drivers and barriers affecting metaverse adoption: A systematic review, theoretical framework, and avenues for future research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2260984
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Aung, N., Dhelim, S., Chen, L., Ning, H., Atzori, L., & Kechadi, T. (2024). Edge-enabled metaverse: The convergence of metaverse and mobile edge computing. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 29(3), 795‒805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010052
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Awan, K. A., Din, I. U., Almogren, A., & Seo-Kim, B. (2023). Blockchain-based trust management for virtual entities in the metaverse: A model for avatar and virtual organization interactions. IEEE Access, 11, 136370‒136394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3337806
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Balaska, V., Adamidou, Z., Vryzas, Z., & Gasteratos, A. (2023). Sustainable crop protection via robotics and artificial intelligence solutions. Machines, 11(8), 774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11080774
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bellalouna, F., & Puljiz, D. (2023). Use case for the application of the industrial metaverse approach for engineering design review. Procedia CIRP, 119, 638‒643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.116
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya, P., Saraswat, D., Savaliya, D., Sanghavi, S., Verma, A., Sakariya, V., Sharma, R., Raboaca, M. S., & Manea, D. L. (2023). Towards future Internet: The metaverse perspective for diverse industrial applications. Mathematics, 11(4), 941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11040941
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Calandra, D., Oppioli, M., Sadraei, R., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., & Biancone, P. P. (2024). Metaverse meets digital entrepreneurship: A practitioner-based qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 666‒686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2023-0041
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Camacho-Muñoz, G. A., Camilo Martínez Franco, J., Nope-Rodríguez, S. E., Loaiza-Correa, H., Gil-Parga, S., & Álvarez-Martínez, D. (2023). 6D-ViCuT: Six degree-of-freedom visual cuboid tracking dataset for manual packing of cargo in warehouses. Data in Brief, 49, 109385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109385
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Cao, J., Zhu, X., Sun, S., Wei, Z., Jiang, Y., Wang, J., & Lau, V. K. N. (2023). Toward industrial metaverse: Age of information, latency and reliability of short-packet transmission in 6G. IEEE Wireless Communications, 30(2), 40‒47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2001.2200396
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Chai, T., Li, M., Zhou, Z., Cheng, S., Jia, Y., & Wu, Z. (2023a). An intelligent control method for the low-carbon operation of energy-intensive equipment. Engineering, 27, 84‒95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.05.018
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Chai, Y., Qian, J., & Younas, M. (2023b). Metaverse: Concept, key technologies, and vision. International Journal of Crowd Science, 7(4), 149‒157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100024
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Chang, L., Zhang, Z., Li, P., Xi, S., Guo, W., Shen, Y., Xiong, Z., Kang, J., Niyato, D., Qiao, X., & Wu, Y. (2022). 6G-enabled edge AI for metaverse: Challenges, methods, and future research directions. Journal of Communications and Information Networks, 7(2), 107‒121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/JCIN.2022.9815195
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Chen, C., Fu, H., Zheng, Y., Tao, F., & Liu, Y. (2023a). The advance of digital twin for predictive maintenance: The role and function of machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 581‒594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.10.010
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Chen, C., Zhang, H., Hou, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Dai, J., Pang, S., & Wang, C. (2023b). Deep learning in the ubiquitous human–computer interactive 6G era: Applications, principles and prospects. Biomimetics, 8(4), 343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8040343
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Chen, W., Zeng, C., Liang, H., Sun, F., & Zhang, J. (2023c). Multimodality driven impedance-based Sim2Real transfer learning for robotic multiple peg-in-hole assembly. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2023.3310505
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Chen, Y., Huang, W., Jiang, X., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Yan, B., Wang, Z., Chen, Q., Xing, Y., Li, D., & Long, G. (2023d). UbiMeta: A ubiquitous operating system model for metaverse. International Journal of Crowd Science, 7(4), 180‒189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100028
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Chowdhury, M. (2023a). Icon: An intelligent resource slicing and task coordination framework for Web 3.0 and metaverse-based service execution over 6G-based immersive edge computing network. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 44(3), 167‒202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAHUC.2023.134763
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Chowdhury, M. (2023b). Servant: A user service requirements, timeslot sacrifice, and triple benefit-aware resource and worker provisioning scheme for digital twin and MEC enhanced 6G networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 41(4), 205‒228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSNET.2023.130710
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Cui, Z., Yang, X., Yue, J., Liu, X., Tao, W., Xia, Q., & Wu, C. (2023). A review of digital twin technology for electromechanical products: Evolution focus throughout key lifecycle phases. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 70, 264‒287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.016
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Dolgui, A., & Ivanov, D. (2023). Metaverse supply chain and operations management. International Journal of Production Research, 61(23), 8179‒8191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2240900
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Erman, B., & Martino, C. D. (2023). Generative network performance prediction with network digital twin. IEEE Network, 37(2), 286‒292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.002.2200515
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Faraboschi, P., Frachtenberg, E., Laplante, P., Milojicic, D., & Saracco, R. (2023). Digital transformation: Lights and shadows. Computer, 56(4), 123‒130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3241726
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Ferrari, F., & McKelvey, F. (2023). Hyperproduction: A social theory of deep generative models. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 24(2), 338‒360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2022.2137546
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Ferrigno, G., Di Paola, N., Oguntegbe, K. F., & Kraus, S. (2023). Value creation in the metaverse age: A thematic analysis of press releases. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(11), 337‒363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2023-0039
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Fu, M., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Wu, J., Sun, L., Ma, Z., Huang, R., Li, X., Wang, D., & Liang, Q. (2023). Environmental intelligent perception in the industrial Internet of Things: A case study analysis of a multicrane visual sorting system. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(19), 22731‒22741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3294962
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Ganchev, I., Ji, Z., & O’Droma, M. (2023). Horizontal IoT platform EMULSION. Electronics, 12(8), 1864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081864
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Gattullo, M., Laviola, E., Evangelista, A., Fiorentino, M., & Uva, A. E. (2022). Towards the evaluation of augmented reality in the metaverse: Information presentation modes. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 12600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412600
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Gourisetti, S. N. G., Bhadra, S., Sebastian-Cardenas, D. J., Touhiduzzaman, M., & Ahmed, O. A. (2023). Theoretical open architecture framework and technology stack for digital twins in energy sector applications. Energies, 16(13), 4853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16134853
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Grieves, M. (2023). Digital twin certified: Employing virtual testing of digital twins in manufacturing to ensure quality products. Machines, 11(8), 808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11080808
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Guo, Y., Klink, A., Bartolo, P., & Guo, W. G. (2023). Digital twins for electro-physical, chemical, and photonic processes. CIRP Annals, 72(2), 593‒619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2023.05.007
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Han, J., Yang, M., Chen, X., Liu, H., Wang, Y., Li, J., Su, Z., Li, Z., & Ma, X. (2023a). ParaDefender: A scenario-driven parallel system for defending metaverses. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4), 2118‒2127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3228928
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Han, S., Jin, L., Xu, X., Tao, X., & Zhang, P. (2023b). R3C: Reliability and control cost co-aware in RIS-assisted wireless control systems for IIoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 11(8), 13692‒13707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3338618
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Hou, J., Chen, G., Li, Z., He, W., Gu, S., Knoll, A., & Jiang, C. (2024). Hybrid residual multiexpert reinforcement learning for spatial scheduling of high-density parking lots. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 54(5), 2771‒2783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2023.3312647
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Hou, X., Wang, J., Jiang, C., Meng, Z., Chen, J., & Ren, Y. (2024). Efficient federated learning for metaverse via dynamic user selection, gradient quantization and resource allocation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(4), 850‒866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345393
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Huawei, H., Qinnan, Z., Taotao, L., Qinglin, Y., Zhaokang, Y., Junhao, W., Xiong, Z., Jianming, Z., Wu, J., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Economic systems in the metaverse: Basics, state of the art, and challenges. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4), 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3626315
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Jagatheesaperumal, S. K., & Rahouti, M. (2022). Building digital twins of cyber physical systems with metaverse for Industry 5.0 and beyond. IT Professional, 24(6), 34‒40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2022.3225064
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Jagatheesaperumal, S. K., Yang, Z., Yang, Q., Huang, C., Xu, W., Shikh-Bahaei, M., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Semantic-aware digital twin for metaverse: A comprehensive review. IEEE Wireless Communications, 30(4), 38‒46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.003.2200616
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Jaimini, U., Zhang, T., Brikis, G. O., & Sheth, A. (2022). iMetaverseKG: Industrial metaverse knowledge graph to promote interoperability in design and engineering applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 26(6), 59‒67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2022.3212085
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Jamshidi, M., Dehghaniyan Serej, A., Jamshidi, A., & Moztarzadeh, O. (2023). The meta-metaverse: Ideation and future directions. Future Internet, 15(8), 252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080252
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Ji, B., Wang, X., Liang, Z., Zhang, H., Xia, Q., Xie, L., Yan, H., Sun, F., Feng, H., Tao, K., Shen, Q., & Yin, E. (2023). Flexible strain sensor-based data glove for gesture interaction in the metaverse: A review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2212232
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Jim, J. R., Hosain, M. T., Mridha, M. F., Kabir, M. M., & Shin, J. (2023). Toward trustworthy metaverse: Advancements and challenges. IEEE Access, 11, 118318‒118347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3326258
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Kaarlela, T., Padrao, P., Pitkäaho, T., Pieskä, S., & Bobadilla, L. (2023a). Digital twins utilizing XR-technology as robotic training tools. Machines, 11(1), 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11010013
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Kaarlela, T., Pitkäaho, T., Pieskä, S., Padrão, P., Bobadilla, L., Tikanmäki, M., Haavisto, T., Blanco Bataller, V., Laivuori, N., Luimula, M. (2023b). Towards metaverse: Utilizing extended reality and digital twins to control robotic systems. Actuators, 12(6), 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/act12060219
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Kaigom, E. G. (2024). Metarobotics for industry and society: Vision, technologies, and opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 20(4), 5725‒5736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3337380
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Khalaj, O., Jamshidi, M., Hassas, P., Hosseininezhad, M., Mašek, B., Štadler, C., & Svoboda, J. (2023). Metaverse and AI digital twinning of 42SiCr steel alloys. Mathematics, 11(1), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11010004
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Koohang, A., Nord, J. H., Ooi, K.-B., Wei-Han Tan, G., Al-Emran, M., Cheng-Xi Aw, E., Baabdullahh, A. M., Buhalis, D., Cham, T.-H., Dennis, C., Dutot, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Mogaji, E., Pandey, N., Phau, I., Raman, R., Sharma, A., Sigala, M., Ueno, A., & Wong, L.-W. (2023). Shaping the metaverse into reality: A holistic multidisciplinary understanding of opportunities, challenges, and avenues for future investigation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(3), 735‒765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2165197
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Kshetri, N. (2023a). The economics of the industrial metaverse. IT Professional, 25(1), 84‒88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2023.3236494
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Kshetri, N. (2023b). Metaverse technologies in product management, branding and communications: Virtual and augmented reality, artificial intelligence, non-fungible tokens and brain‒computer interface. Central European Management Journal, 31(4), 511‒521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-08-2023-0336
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Laviola, E., Gattullo, M., Manghisi, V. M., Fiorentino, M., & Uva, A. E. (2022). Minimal AR: Visual asset optimization for the authoring of augmented reality work instructions in manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 119, 1769–1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08449-6
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Lăzăroiu, G., Androniceanu, A., Grecu, I., Grecu, G., & Neguriță, O. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things sensing networks, and sustainable cyber-physical management systems in big data-driven cognitive manufacturing. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(4), 1047–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.030
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Lăzăroiu, G., Bogdan, M., Geamănu, M., Hurloiu, L., Luminița, L., & Ștefănescu, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence algorithms and cloud computing technologies in blockchain-based fintech management. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 707–730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.021
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Lee, J., & Kundu, P. (2022). Integrated cyber-physical systems and industrial metaverse for remote manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 34, 12‒15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.08.012
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wuest, T., Mourtzis D., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 279‒295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Lewandowska, A., Berniak-Woźny, J., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Competitiveness and innovation of small and medium enter-prises under Industry 4.0 and 5.0 challenges: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 1045–1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.033
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Li, K., Lau, B. P. L., Yuan, X., Ni, W., Guizani, M., & Yuen, C. (2023a). Toward ubiquitous semantic metaverse: Challenges, approaches, and opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(24), 21855‒21872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3302159
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Li, Q., Kong, L., Min, X., & Zhang, B. (2023b). DareChain: A blockchain-based trusted collaborative network infrastructure for metaverse. International Journal of Crowd Science, 7(4), 168‒179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26599/IJCS.2023.9100025
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Li, X., Tian, Y., Ye, P., Duan, H., & Wang, F.-Y. (2023c). A novel scenarios engineering methodology for foundation models in metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4), 2148‒2159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3228594
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Liu, J., Ma, C., & Wang, S. (2023a). Thermal-structure finite element simulation system architecture in a cloud-edge-end collaborative environment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02269-z
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Liu, S., Xie, J., & Wang, X. (2023b). QoE enhancement of the industrial metaverse based on mixed reality application optimization. Displays, 79, 102463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2023.102463
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Lyu, Z., & Fridenfalk, M. (2023). Digital twins for building industrial metaverse. Journal of Advanced Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2023.11.019
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Ma, S., Liu, H., Pan, N., & Wang, S. (2023). Study on an autonomous distribution system for smart parks based on parallel system theory against the background of Industry 5.0. Journal of King Saud University ‒ Computer and Information Sciences, 35(7), 101608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2023.101608
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Magalhães, L. C., Magalhães, L. C., Ramos, J. B., Moura, L. R., de Moraes, R. E. N., Gonçalves, J. B., Hisatugu, W. H., Souza, M. T., de Lacalle, L. N. L., & Ferreira, J. C. E. (2022). Conceiving a digital twin for a flexible manufacturing system. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199864
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Maier, M., Hosseini, N., & Soltanshahi, M. (2024). INTERBEING: On the symbiosis between INTERnet and human BEING. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 13(3), 98‒106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2023.3319849
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Meng, Z., Chen, K., Diao, Y., She, C., Zhao, G., Imran, M. A., & Vucetic, B. (2024). Task-oriented cross-system design for timely and accurate modelling in the metaverse. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(3), 752‒766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345398
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Mosco, V. (2023). Into the metaverse: Technical challenges, social problems, utopian visions, and policy principles. Javnost ‒ The Public, 30(2), 161‒173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2023.2200688
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Mourad, N., Alsattar, H. A., Qahtan, S., Zaidan, A. A., Deveci, M., Sangaiah, A. K., & Pedrycz, W. (2023). Optimising control engineering tools using digital twin capabilities and other cyber-physical metaverse manufacturing system components. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2023.3326047
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Mourtzis, D., & Angelopoulos, J. (2023). Development of an extended reality-based collaborative platform for engineering education: Operator 5.0. Electronics, 12(17), 3663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173663
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2023a). Blockchain integration in the era of industrial metaverse. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031353
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2023b). The future of the human–machine interface (HMI) in society 5.0. Future Internet, 15(5), 162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15050162
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2024). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) path planning and control assisted by augmented reality (AR): The case of indoor drones. International Journal of Production Research, 62(9), 3361‒3382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2232470
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Nagy, M., Lăzăroiu, G., & Valaskova, K. (2023). Machine intelligence and autonomous robotic technologies in the corporate context of SMEs: Deep learning and virtual simulation algorithms, cyber-physical production networks, and Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031681
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Nair, M. R., Bindu, N., Jose, R., & Satheesh Kumar, K. (2024). From assistive technology to the backbone: The impact of blockchain in manufacturing. Evolutionary Intelligence, 17(3), 1257–1278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-023-00872-w
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Navarro, J. M., & Pita, A. (2023). Machine learning prediction of the long-term environmental acoustic pattern of a city location using short-term sound pressure level measurements. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031613
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Negri, E., & Abdel-Aty, T. A. (2023). Clarifying concepts of metaverse, digital twin, digital thread and AAS for CPS-based production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2), 6351‒6357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.818
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Netland, T., Stegmaier, M., Primultini, C., & Maghazei, O. (2023). Interactive mixed reality live streaming technology in manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 38, 6‒10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.141
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Ooi, K.-B., Wei-Han Tan, G., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Arpaci, I., Zaidan, A. A., Lee, V.-H., Wong, L.-W., Deveci, M., & Iranmanesh, M. (2023). The metaverse in engineering management: Overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3307562
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Özkal, İ., Özkan, İ. A., & Başçiftçi, F. (2024). Metaverse token price forecasting using artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 3267–3290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09228-y
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Park, A., Wilson, M., Robson, K., Demetis, D., & Kietzmann, J. (2023). Interoperability: Our exciting and terrifying Web3 future. Business Horizons, 66(4), 529‒541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Qian, F., Tang, Y., & Yu, X. (2023). The future of process industry: A cyber–physical–social system perspective. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2023.3298838
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Reiman, A., Kaivo-oja, J., Parviainen, E., Takala, E.-P., & Lauraeus, T. (2023). Human work in the shift to Industry 4.0: A road map to the management of technological changes in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2291814
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., & Treiblmaier, H. (2023). Mapping metaverse research: Identifying future research areas based on bibliometric and topic modelling techniques. Information, 14(7), 356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070356
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Ritterbusch, G. D., & Teichmann, M. R. (2023). Defining the metaverse: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 12368‒12377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241809
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Salam, A., Javaid, Q., Ahmad, M., Wahid, I., & Arafat, M. Y. (2023). Cluster-based data aggregation in flying sensor networks enabled Internet of Things. Future Internet, 15(8), 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080279
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Schmitt, M. (2023). Securing the digital world: Protecting smart infrastructures and digital industries with artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled malware and intrusion detection. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 36, 100520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100520
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Semeraro, C., Alyousuf, N., Kedir, N. I., & Lail, E. A. (2023). A maturity model for evaluating the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies and principles in SMEs. Manufacturing Letters, 37, 61‒65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.07.018
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Siriweera, A., & Naruse, K. (2023). QoS-aware federated crosschain-based model-driven reference architecture for IIoT sensor networks in distributed manufacturing. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(23), 29630‒29644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3325342
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Starly, B., Koprov, P., Bharadwaj, A., Batchelder, T., & Breitenbach, B. (2023). Unreal’ factories: Next generation of digital twins of machines and factories in the industrial metaverse. Manufacturing Letters, 37, 50‒52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.07.021
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Stary, C. (2023). Digital process twins as intelligent design technology for engineering metaverse/XR applications. Sustainability, 15(22), 16062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216062
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Stavroulakis, G. E., Charalambidi, B. G., & Koutsianitis, P. (2022). Review of computational mechanics, optimization, and machine learning tools for digital twins applied to infrastructures. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 11997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app122311997
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Stodt, F., Stodt, J., & Reich, C. (2023). Blockchain secured dynamic machine learning pipeline for manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020782
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Stothard, P. (2023). Mining metaverse – A future collaborative tool for best practice mining. Mining Technology, 132(3), 165‒178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25726668.2023.2235155
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Striffler, N., & Voigt, T. (2023). Concepts and trends of virtual commissioning – A comprehensive review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 71, 664‒680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.10.013
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Tan, G. W.-H., Aw, E. C.-X., Cham, T.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Alalwan, A. A., Balakrishnan, J., Chan, H. K., Hew, J.-J., Hughes, L., Jain, V., Lee, V. H., Lin, B., Rana, N. P., & Tan, T. M. (2023). Metaverse in marketing and logistics: The state of the art and the path forward. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(12), 2932‒2946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2023-0078
    View in Google Scholar
  96. Theodoropoulos, N., Kampourakis, E., Andronas, D., & Makris, S. (2023). Cyber-physical systems in non-rigid assemblies: A methodology for the calibration of deformable object reconstruction models. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 70, 525‒537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.022
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Tlili, A., Huang, R., & Kinshuk (2023). Metaverse for climbing the ladder toward ‘Industry 5.0’ and ‘Society 5.0’? Service Industries Journal, 43(3/4), 260‒287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2178644
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Truong, V. T., Le, L., & Niyato, D. (2023). Blockchain meets metaverse and digital asset management: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 11, 26258‒26288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257029
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Wan, X., Zhang, G., Yuan, Y., & Chai, S. (2023). How to drive the participation willingness of supply chain members in metaverse technology adoption? Applied Soft Computing, 145, 110611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110611
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Wan, Z., Gao, Z., Di Renzo, M., & Hanzo, L. (2022). The road to Industry 4.0 and beyond: A communications-, information-, and operation technology collaboration perspective. IEEE Network, 36(6), 157‒164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.008.2100484
    View in Google Scholar
  101. Wang, B., Zheng, P., Yin, Y., Shih, A., & Wang, L. (2022b). Toward human-centric smart manufacturing: A human-cyber-physical systems (HCPS) perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 63, 471‒490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.005
    View in Google Scholar
  102. Wang, H., Ning, H., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Dhelim, S., Farha, F., Ding, J., & Daneshmand, M. (2023a). A survey on the metaverse: The state-of-the-art, technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(16), 14671‒14688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278329
    View in Google Scholar
  103. Wang, P., Wei, Z., Qi, H., Wan, S., Xiao, Y., Sun, G., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Mitigating poor data quality impact with federated unlearning for human-centric metaverse. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 42(4), 832‒849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3345388
    View in Google Scholar
  104. Wang, Y., Su, Z., Guo, S., Dai, M., Luan, T. H., & Liu, Y. (2023b). A survey on digital twins: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and future prospects. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(17), 14965‒14987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3263909
    View in Google Scholar
  105. Wang, Y., Tian, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Y., Li, S., & Tian, B. (2022a). Integrated inspection of QoM, QoP, and QoS for AOI industries in metaverses. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9(12), 2071‒2078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.106091
    View in Google Scholar
  106. Wu, D., Yang, Z., Zhang, P., Wang, R., Yang, B., & Ma, X. (2023). Virtual-reality interpromotion technology for metaverse: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(18), 15788‒15809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3265848
    View in Google Scholar
  107. Xiang, W., Yu, K., Han, F., Fang, L., He, D., & Han, Q.-L. (2024). Advanced manufacturing in Industry 5.0: A survey of key enabling technologies and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(2), 1055‒1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2023.3274224
    View in Google Scholar
  108. Xinyi, T., Juuso, A., Riku, A.-L., Chao, Y., Pauli, S., & Kari, T. (2023). TwinXR: method for using digital twin descriptions in industrial eXtended reality applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, 1019080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1019080
    View in Google Scholar
  109. Xuhong, L., & Xuan, Y. (2023). Green transformational leadership and employee organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in the manufacturing industry: A social information processing perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1097655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1097655
    View in Google Scholar
  110. Yang, J., Wang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Parallel manufacturing for industrial metaverses: A new paradigm in smart manufacturing. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9(12), 2063‒2070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2022.106097
    View in Google Scholar
  111. Yi, H., Qu, T., Zhang, K., Li, M., Huang, G. Q., & Chen, Z. (2023). Production logistics in Industry 3.X: Bibliometric analysis, frontier case study, and future directions. Systems, 11(7), 371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11070371
    View in Google Scholar
  112. Ying, K., Gao, Z., Chen, S., Zhou, M., Zheng, D., Chatzinotas, S., Ottersten, B., & Poor, H. V. (2023). Quasi-synchronous random access for massive MIMO-based LEO satellite constellations. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 41(6), 1702‒1722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3273699
    View in Google Scholar
  113. Yu, B., Liu, Y., Ren, S., Zhou, Z., & Liu, J. (2023). METAseen: Analyzing network traffic and privacy policies in Web 3.0 based metaverse. Digital Communications and Networks. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2023.11.006
    View in Google Scholar
  114. Zaidan, A. A., Alsattar, H. A., Qahtan, S., Deveci, M., Pamucar, D., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2023). Uncertainty decision modelling approach for control engineering tools to support industrial cyber-physical metaverse smart manufacturing systems. IEEE Systems Journal, 17(4), 5303‒5314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2023.3266842
    View in Google Scholar
  115. Zeng, S., Li, Z., Yu, H., Zhang, Z., Luo, L., Li, B., & Niyato, D. (2023). HFedMS: Heterogeneous federated learning with memorable data semantics in industrial metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 11(3), 3055‒3069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2023.3254587
    View in Google Scholar
  116. Zhang, L., Du, Q., Lu, L., & Zhang, S. (2023). Overview of the integration of communications, sensing, computing, and storage as enabling technologies for the metaverse over 6G networks. Electronics, 12(17), 3651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12173651
    View in Google Scholar
  117. Zhou, X., Liu, C., & Zhao, J. (2023). Resource allocation of federated learning for the metaverse with mobile augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10279550
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 291

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.