Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Digitalization and digital technologies: The obstacles to adaptation among Hungarian farmers

Abstract

Research background: Digital technologies aim to enhance efficiency, competitiveness, and sustainability. Despite ongoing efforts, Hungary is encountering various challenges in digitalization. This research seeks to investigate the potential of digital technologies in addressing these challenges, with a particular focus on precision agriculture technologies (PA).

Purpose of the article: This study explores the utilization of digital technologies among 81 agricultural and food companies in Hungary. The study evaluates the use of advanced and less advanced digital technologies and their impact on rural areas. Additionally, the research seeks to understand the economic and social impacts resulting from the adoption of these technologies, focusing specifically on precision farming.

Methods: The study uses advanced clustering methods to categorize agricultural companies based on their use of digital technology. The research employed the two-step clustering method, which has been recognized for its robustness in clustering mixed-level variables.

Findings & value added: Farmers and food producers generally have low adoption rates of advanced digital technologies, preferring common but less advanced tools. This is mainly due to high investment costs, economies of scale, limited experience and expertise, and a lack of willingness to cooperate among farmers. The respondents could be classified into two groups: one group is aware and even understands advanced technology, but rarely uses it. In contrast, the other group is largely unaware of these technologies. The results indicate that a lack of knowledge and expertise can significantly impede the adoption of advanced technologies in agriculture. Policymakers must develop a mix of policies that collectively reduce the economic barriers to technology adoption while engaging stakeholders who may not fully understand the benefits of advanced technologies.

Keywords

digitalization, Hungarian farmers, clustering, precision agriculture

PDF

References

  1. Bacher, J., Wenzig, K., & Vogler, M. (2004). SPSS twostep cluster-a first evaluation. Nürnberg: Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut Lehrstuhl für Soziologie. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-327153.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Balogh, P., Bai, A., Czibere, I., Kovách, I., Fodor, L., Bujdos, Á., Sulyok, D., Gabnai, Z., & Birkner, Z. (2021). Economic and social barriers of precision farming in Hungary. Agronomy, 11(6), 1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061112
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bramley, R., & Trengove, S. (2013). Precision agriculture in Australia: Present status and recent developments. Engenharia Agrícola, 33(3), 575–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162013000300014
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2021). Assessing the level of digitalization and robotization in the enterprises of the European Union Member States. Plos One, 16(7), e0254993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254993
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bronson, K., & Knezevic, I. (2016). Big Data in food and agriculture. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 2053951716648174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716648174
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Butollo, F. (2021). Digitalization and the geographies of production: Towards reshoring or global fragmentation? Competition & Change, 25(2), 259–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420918160
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Jeris, C. (2001). A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 263-268). ACM Digital Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/502512.502549
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W. F., Azevedo, I. M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Geels, F. W., Grubler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E. G., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J. C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N. D., Steinberger, J. K., Tavoni, M., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 260–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Czibere, I., Kovách, I., & Loncsák, N. (2023). Hungarian Farmers and the Adoption of Precision Farming. European Countryside, 15(3), 366–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2023-0020
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Daberkow, S. G., & McBride, W. D. (2003). Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agriculture technologies in the US. Precision Agriculture, 4, 163–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024557205871
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review: Hm Treasury.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Ehlers, M.-H., Finger, R., El Benni, N., Gocht, A., Sørensen, C. A. G., Gusset, M., Pfeifer, C., Poppe, K., Regan, Á., Rose, D. C., Wolfert, S., & Huber, R. (2022). Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation. Agricultural Systems, 196, 103318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103318
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Ehlers, M.-H., Huber, R., & Finger, R. (2021). Agricultural policy in the era of digitalisation. Food Policy, 100, 102019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102019
    View in Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2023a). At a glance: Hungary's CAP Strategic Plan. Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-04/csp-at-a-glance-hungary_en.pdf.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. European Commission (2023b). Digitalisation of the European agricultural sector: Activities in Horizon 2020. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digitalisation-agriculture-horizon-2020.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. European Commission (2023c). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-ind ex-desi-2022.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. European Commission (2023d). Shaping Europe’s digital future. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digitalisation-agriculture.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. FAO (2020). Biodiversity and the livestock sector – Guidelines for quantitative assessment – Version 1. Rome, Italy, Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership (FAO LEAP), 1–142. doi:
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Gaál, M., Molnár, A., Illés, I., Kiss, A., Lámfalusi, I., & Kemény, G. (2021). Where do we stand with digitalization? An assessment of digital transformation in Hungarian agriculture. In D. Bochtis, C. Achillas, G. Banias & M. Lampridi (Eds.). Bio-economy and agri-production: Concepts and evidence (pp. 195–206). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819774-5.00011-4
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Gabriel, A., & Gandorfer, M. (2023). Adoption of digital technologies in agriculture—an inventory in a european small-scale farming region. Precision Agriculture, 24(1), 68–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Galanakis, C. M., Rizou, M., Aldawoud, T. M., Ucak, I., & Rowan, N. J. (2021). Innovations and technology disruptions in the food sector within the COVID-19 pandemic and post-lockdown era. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 110, 193–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.002
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Garske, B., Bau, A., & Ekardt, F. (2021). Digitalization and AI in European agriculture: a strategy for achieving climate and biodiversity targets? Sustainability, 13(9), 4652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094652
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Giannakis, E., & Bruggeman, A. (2015). The highly variable economic performance of European agriculture. Land Use Policy, 45, 26–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.009
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Griffin, T. W., Miller, N. J., Bergtold, J., Shanoyan, A., Sharda, A., & Ciampitti, I. A. (2017). Farm’s sequence of adoption of information-intensive precision agricultural technology. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 33(4), 521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.12228
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Hoyk, E., Szalai, Á., Palkovics, A., & Farkas, J. Z. (2022). Policy gaps related to sustainability in Hungarian agribusiness development. Agronomy, 12(9), 2084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092084
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Huang, J.-k. (2020). Impacts of COVID-19 on agriculture and rural poverty in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(12), 2849–2853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63469-4
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Jorge-Vázquez, J., Chivite-Cebolla, M. P., & Salinas-Ramos, F. (2021). The Digitalization of the European agri-food cooperative sector. Determining factors to embrace information and communication technologies. Agriculture, 11(6), 514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060514
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Kamilaris, A., Kartakoullis, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2017). A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 143, 23–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Khanna, M. (2021). Digital transformation of the agricultural sector: Pathways, drivers and policy implications. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(4), 1221–1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13103
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Kosior, K. (2019). Towards a new data economy for EU agriculture. Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs, 23(4), 91–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33067/SE.4.2019.6
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Kovac, N., Żmija, K., Roy, J. K., Kusa, R., & Duda, J. (2024). Digital divide and digitalization in Europe: A bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 463–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2899
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Kovács, I., & Husti, I. (2018). The role of digitalization in the agricultural 4.0–how to connect the industry 4.0 to agriculture? Hungarian Agricultural Engineering, 33, 38–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17676/HAE.2018.32.38
    View in Google Scholar
  33. KSH (2023). Agrárcenzus eredmények – Agrárdigitalizáció. Retrieved from https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/ac2020/agrardigitalizacio/index.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Lioutas, E. D., Charatsari, C., & De Rosa, M. (2021). Digitalization of agriculture: A way to solve the food problem or a trolley dilemma? Technology in Society, 67, 101744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101744
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Lu, L., Reardon, T., & Zilberman, D. (2016). Supply chain design and adoption of indivisible technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(5), 1419–1431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw076
    View in Google Scholar
  36. MacPherson, J., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Olbrisch, M., Schöbel, P., Dönitz, E., Mouratiadou, I., & Helming, K. (2022). Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(4), 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6
    View in Google Scholar
  37. McFadden, J., Casalini, F., Griffin, T., & Antón, J. (2022). The digitalisation of agriculture: A literature review and emerging policy issues. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, 176.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Osinga, S. A., Paudel, D., Mouzakitis, S. A., & Athanasiadis, I. N. (2022). Big data in agriculture: Between opportunity and solution. Agricultural systems, 195, 103298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103298
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Bacco, M., Bartolini, F., Bulten, E., Debruyne, L., Dessein, J., Scotti, I., & Brunori, G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 79–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Rolandi, S., Brunori, G., Bacco, M., & Scotti, I. (2021). The digitalization of agriculture and rural areas: Towards a taxonomy of the impacts. Sustainability, 13(9), 5172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095172
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Schimmelpfennig, D. (2016). Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture. ERR-217, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.249773.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Stechemesser, A., Koch, N., Mark, E., Dilger, E., Klösel, P., Menicacci, L., Nachtigall, D., Pretis, F., Ritter, N., Schwarz, M., Vossen, H., & Wenzel, A. (2024). Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: Global evidence from two decades. Science, 385(6711), 884–892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl6547
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Szenderák, J., Fróna, D., & Harangi-Rákos, M. (2021). National policy report Hungary. Retrieved from https://desira2020.eu/.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Takácsné György, K., Lámfalusi, I., Molnár, A., Sulyok, D., Gaál, M., Domán, C., Illés, I., Kiss, A., Péter, K., & Kemény, G. (2018). Precision agriculture in Hungary: Assessment of perceptions and accounting records of FADN arable farms. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 120(1316-2018-2929), 47–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1717
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Vasilescu, M. D., Serban, A. C., Dimian, G. C., Aceleanu, M. I., & Picatoste, X. (2020). Digital divide, skills and perceptions on digitalisation in the European Union—Towards a smart labour market. PloS One, 15(4), e0232032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232032
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Yang, M., Fu, M., & Zhang, Z. (2021). The adoption of digital technologies in supply chains: Drivers, process and impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120795
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.