Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting standards: Evidence from Baltic public companies

Abstract

Research background: Recently, companies have been increasingly focusing on social responsibility and disclosure. They use a variety of standards to disclose their social responsibility. The prevalence of these practices varies between companies in different countries. In addition, some companies declare CSR reporting standards, while others do not. Stakeholders need to know the characteristics of companies that declare CSR reporting standards.

Purpose of the article: This study aims to reveal the factors influencing the choice to declare CSR reporting standards in Baltic public companies.

Methods: The choice to declare CSR reporting standards is measured by the fact of CSR reporting standards’ declaration and the choice of GRI. The data for dependent variables are collected from non-financial reporting of Baltic public companies by making the content analysis. Company visibility, financial performance, and market expectations are chosen as independent variables. Their data is obtained from the Bloomberg database. Logistic regression models are applied.

Findings & value added: Only half of the companies surveyed disclosed the CSR reporting standards used. Estonian public companies prefer GRI standards, and Lithuanian public companies prefer GRI plus UNGC. CSR reporting standards tend to be declared by those public companies that are larger and operate in the “heavy industry” as well as have higher EPS and lower ROA and CAPI. Market expectations are irrelevant to the disclosure of CSR reporting standards. By contrast, GRI standards are used and disclosed by public companies with the same characteristics as those declaring the standards. Still, in this case, age and market expectations are also important factors. Younger and higher market-value companies tend to choose GRI standards. These results reflect managerial behavior based on legitimacy, stakeholder, and signaling theories. Our findings are important to investors, market regulators, policymakers, managers and shareholders.

Keywords

ESG performance, CSR reporting standards, GRI standards, GRI-UNGC standards, declaration of standards

PDF

References

  1. Afolabi, H., Ram, R., & Rimmel, G. (2023). Influence and behaviour of the new standard setters in the sustainability reporting arena: Implications for the Global Reporting Initiative’s current position. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 743–775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0052
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Anas, A., Abdul Rashid, H. M., & Annuar, H. A. (2015). The effect of award on CSR disclosures in annual reports of Malaysian PLCs. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 831–852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2013-0014
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Balluchi, F., Furlotti, K., Mazzieri, M., & Torelli, R. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosure in Italy: An analysis of the last years. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(1), 54–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v9-i1/5724
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Balogh, I., Srivastava, M., & Tyll, L. (2022). Towards comprehensive corporate sustainability reporting: An empirical study of factors influencing ESG disclosures of large Czech companies. Society and Business Review, 17(4), 541–573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-07-2021-0114
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bochkay, K., Hales, J., & Serafeim, G. (2021). Disclosure standards and communication norms: Evidence of voluntary sustainability standards as a coordinating device for capital markets. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3928979
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Brotherton, M. C. (2019). Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: The auditors’ perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 703–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3516-4
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Chauvey, J. N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 789–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2114-y
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Ching, H. Y., Gerab, F., & Toste, T. H. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Brazilian listed companies. SAGE Open, 7(2), 215824401771202. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/2158244017712027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017712027
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Chiu, T. K., & Wang, Y. H. (2015). Determinants of social disclosure quality in Taiwan: An application of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 379–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2160-5
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer Jr, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Cicchiello, A. F., Marrazza, F., & Perdichizzi, S. (2023). Non-financial disclosure regulation and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: The case of EU and US firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1025–1533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2408
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Cotter, J., & Najah, M. M. (2012). Institutional investor influence on global climate change disclosure practices. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 169–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211423945
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Cuomo, F., Gaia, S., Girardone, C., & Piserà, S. (2024). The effects of the EU non-financial reporting directive on corporate social responsibility. European Journal of Finance, 30(7), 726–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2022.2113812
    View in Google Scholar
  16. de Grosbois, D., & Fennell, D. A. (2022). Determinants of climate change disclosure practices of global hotel companies: Application of institutional and stakeholder theories. Tourism Management, 88, 104404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104404
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Dewi, N. P. Y. K., & Wirawati, N. G. P. (2021). The influence of share ownership structure and company size on corporate social responsibility disclosures. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 67–73.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Dyduch, J., & Krasodomska, J. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An empirical study of Polish listed companies. Sustainability, 9(11), 1934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111934
    View in Google Scholar
  19. El-Bassiouny, D., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2019). Diversity, corporate governance and CSR reporting: A comparative analysis between top-listed firms in Egypt, Germany and the USA. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 116–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0150
    View in Google Scholar
  20. EU Commission. Commission delegated regulation 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202302772.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. EU Commission. Communication from the Commission. Guidelines on non-financial reporting (Methodology for reporting non-financial information) (2017/C 215/01). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017 XC0705%2801%29.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. EU Commission. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0095.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. EU Commission. Directive 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2464.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent directors' background and CSR disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 295–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1515
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Galani, D., Gravas, E., & Stavropoulos, A. (2012). Company characteristics and environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(4), 236–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.731
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Quina-Custodio, I. A. (2016). Disclosure of corporate social responsibility information and explanatory factors. Online Information Review, 40(2), 218–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0116
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Garcia, E. A. D. R., Carvalho, G. M. D., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Souza Filho, J. M. D. (2021). Determinants of corporate social performance disclosure: A literature review. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(4), 445–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2016-0224
    View in Google Scholar
  28. García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Aibar-Guzmán, C., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2022). Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Does it reduce decoupling practices? Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(1), 118–138. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12394
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Giannarakis, G. (2014). The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-0021
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2014). Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision, 52(10), 1928–1951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Sustainability disclosure database. (2017). Retrieved form http://database.globalreporting.org/search.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Gunawan, A., Puntoro, H. R., & Pakolo, R. P. (2019). The effect of profitability, company age, and public ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 5(2), 291–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v5i2.4860
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Gurvitš-Suits, N. A., & Sidorova, I. (2022). Decade of sustainability reporting in EU: Main changes and trends. Case of companies listed on NASDAQ OMX Baltic main list. European Integration Studies, 16, 78–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.1.16.31241
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2015). Organizations, climate change, and transparency: Reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575542
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69(1), 106–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.11.008
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Helfaya, A., Morris, R., & Aboud, A. (2023). Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe. Sustainability, 15(6), 5508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065508
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Hsiao, P.-C. K., De Villiers, C., Horner, C., & Oosthuizen, H. (2022). A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda. Accounting & Finance, 62(4), 4453–4483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12936
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Huang, X. B., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34(1), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001
    View in Google Scholar
  39. IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/supporting-implementation/supporting-materials-for-ifrs-sustainability-disclosure-standards/ifrs-s1/.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. IFRS S2 Climate-related disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclos ures/.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, G., Bartosch, J., Avetisyan, E., Kinderman, D., & Knudsen, J. S. (2020). Mandatory non-financial disclosure and its influence on CSR: An international comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 323–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04200-0
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101668
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Khatri, I., & Kjærland, F. (2023). Sustainability reporting practices and environmental performance amongst Nordic listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138172
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Klimczak, K. M., Hadro, D., & Meyer, M. (2023). Executive communication with stakeholders on sustainability: The case of Poland. Accounting in Europe, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2213242
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Koseoglu, M. A., Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Cemil Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2021). Exploring the connections among CSR performance, reporting, and external assurance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94. 102819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102819
    View in Google Scholar
  47. KPMG (2022). Survey of sustainability reporting 2022. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg.com › kpmg › pdf › komm PDF.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Leitonienė, Š., Dagilienė, L., & Rudžionienė, K. (2024). Sustainability accounting and reporting: From theory to practice in a transition economy. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 23(1), 74–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2024.135641
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2016). The credibility of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 186–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.060
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Lu, F., Kozak, R., Toppinen, A., D’Amato, D., & Wen, Z. (2017). Factors influencing levels of CSR disclosure by forestry companies in China. Sustainability, 9(10), 1800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101800
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Lu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Liang, M., Abrhám, J., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Assessment of corporate social responsibility performance and state promotion policies: A case study of the Baltic states. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(4), 1203–1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.12738
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Lu, Y., & Abeysekera, I. (2014). Stakeholders’ power, corporate characteristics, and social and environmental disclosure: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 426–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.005
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 386–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.17
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Mayorova, E. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the European retail sector. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 891–904. https://doi.org/0.9770/jesi.2019.9.2(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(7)
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Moroney, R., Windsor, C., & Aw, Y. T. (2012). Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: An empirical analysis. Accounting & Finance, 52(3), 903–939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00413.x
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Moser, D. V., & Martin, P. R. (2012). A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Accounting Review, 87(3), 797–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10257
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Nampoothiri, M. V., Entrop, O., & Annamalai, T.R. (2024). Effect of mandatory sustainability performance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from listed European firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2860
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Naseem, M. A., Rehman, R. U., Ikram, A., & Malik, F. (2017). Impact of board characteristics on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 33(4), 801–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v33i4.10001
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Nguyen, T. H., Vu, Q. T., Nguyen, D. M., & Le, H. L. (2021). Factors influencing corporate social responsibility disclosure and its impact on financial performance: The case of Vietnam. Sustainability, 13(15), 8197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158197
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 136–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Nurleni, N., & Bandang, A. (2018). The effect of managerial and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(4), 979–987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2017-0078
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Park, J. D., Nishitani, K., Kokubu, K., Freedman, M., & Weng, Y. (2023). Revisiting sustainability disclosure theories: Evidence from corporate climate change disclosure in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135203
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Qureshi, M. A., Kirkerud, S., Theresa, K., & Ahsan, T. (2020). The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1199–1214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Rosa, F. D., Lunkes, R. J., Hein, N., Vogt, M., & Degenhart, L. (2014). Analysis of the determinants of disclosure of environmental impacts of Brazilian companies. Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(6), 249–266.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. SASB standards. Retrieved from https://sasb.org/standards/.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Solikhah, B. (2016). An overview of legitimacy theory on the influence of company size and industry sensitivity towards CSR disclosure. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research (IJABER), 14(5), 3013–3023.
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G., & Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: the role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 102–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.109
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Stanny, E., & Ely, K. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(6), 338–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.175
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Syed, M. A., & Butt, S. A. (2017). Financial and non-financial determinants of corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(4), 780–797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2016-0146
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Retrieved from https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/support-tcfd/.
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Ting, P. H. (2021). Do large firms just talk corporate social responsibility? – The evidence from CSR report disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101476
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470–484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Tsang, A., Frost, T., & Cao, H. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101149. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.bar.2022.101149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101149
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Tschopp, D., & Nastanski, M. (2014). The harmonization and convergence of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 147–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1906-9
    View in Google Scholar
  76. UN Global Compact – the ten principles. Retrieved from https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2021). Analyzing companies' interactions with the Sustainable Development Goals through network analysis: Four corporate sustainability imperatives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2396–2420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2753
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Vogt, M., Hein, N., Da Rosa, F. S., & Degenhart, L. (2017). Relationship between determinant factors of disclosure of information on environmental impacts of Brazilian companies. Estudios Gerenciales, 33(142), 24–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2016.10.007
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Vouros, P., Nomikos, S., Halkos, G., Evangelinos, K., Sfakianaki, E., Konstandakopoulou, F., Fotiadis, S., Karagiannis, I., Skouloudis, A., & Nikolaou, I. E. (2020). Introducing fundamental accountability principles in sustainability reporting assessment: A cross‐sectoral analysis from the Greek business sector. Environmental Quality Management, 29(4), 33–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21689
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Wang, P., Wang, X., & Wu, J. (2023). Executives’ regulatory experiences and corporate social responsibility. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103984
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Wuttichindanon, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility disclosure – choices of report and its determinants: Empirical evidence from firms listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 156–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.07.002
    View in Google Scholar

  82. View in Google Scholar
  83. Yevdokimova, M., Zamlynskyi, V., Kuznietsov, E., Sakovska, O., & Hatsko, A. (2018). Evolution of social responsibility applied to the concept of sustainable development: Mainstream of the 20th century. Journal of Security and Sustainability, 8(1), 69–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.8.1(6)
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Zumente, I., Bistrova, J., & Lāce, N. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance policy integration and implementation from the perspective of corporations. Intellectual Economics, 16(1), 41–57.
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.