Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Governance challenges and strategic opportunities for implementing circular economy in greenhouse horticulture: A case study from the Netherlands

Abstract

Research background: Circular economy is promoted as a sustainable and efficient economic model in all industries. In the European agricultural sector, and particularly in greenhouse horticulture, its implementation presents both substantial opportunities and significant challenges that must be addressed effectively. The European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has the potential to act as a critical catalyst for the adoption of circular economy through its subsidy and support mechanisms. However, progress remains constrained by a lack of comprehensive information on how governance can effectively advance circular economy in different countries and sectors. This gap persists due to the failure to identify several key aspects, and current CAP mechanisms do not adequately address these issues, thereby limiting their effectiveness in promoting a circular economy.

Purpose of the article: To identify key government actors influencing the implementation of circular economy in Dutch greenhouse horticulture, assess the transformative potential of their initiatives and evaluate factors that hinder or facilitate progress.

Methods: A review of the scientific literature, application of the Governance Assessment Tool (GAT), and validation of the results by key stakeholders involved.

Findings & value added: By applying the GAT, this article offers a detailed assessment of the governance dimensions affecting the implementation of circular economy in greenhouse horticulture in the Netherlands. The research reveals that effective governance is crucial for coordinating and collaborating among various involved stakeholders, such as producers, cooperatives, and auxiliary industries. The challenges highlighted include the lack of consensus among market actors and the need for more coherent policies. Currently, strategic opportunities are identified to improve implementation, such as strengthening public policies and promoting investments in sustainable technologies. Evaluation of these governance dimensions allows for determining where to focus time and resources to advance the implementation of circular economy, transforming current limitations into opportunities to support and enhance the transition process.

Keywords

governance, sustainable development, stakeholder, circular economy, agriculture

PDF

References

  1. Abbate, S., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Giardino, G., & Passaro, R. (2023). Coming out the egg: Assessing the benefits of circular economy strategies in agri-food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135665. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135665
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Acuna, S. A., Lam, W., Daly, C., Kim, S. J., & Baxter, N. N. (2018). Cancer evaluation in the assessment of solid organ transplant candidates: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Transplantation Reviews, 32(1), 29–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2017.10.002
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Ali, J., & Ali, T. (2023). Circular economy and agriculture: Mapping scientific productivity, research pattern and future research direction. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(12), 30063–30108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03963-x
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Anthonj, C., Stanglow, S. N., & Grunwald, N. (2024). Co-defining WASH (In)Security challenges among people experiencing homelessness. A qualitative study on the Human Right to Water and Sanitation from Bonn, Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 342, 116561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116561
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Arias, O., Pulgar, J. A., & Soto, M. (2022). Application of organic wastes to soils and legislative intricacies in a circular economy context. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(6), 1871–1888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02293-2
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Awasthi, M. K., Sarsaiya, S., Wainaina, S., Rajendran, K., Kumar, S., Quan, W., Duan, Y., Awasthi, S. K., Chen, H., Pandey, A., Zhang, Z., Jain, A., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2019). A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 111, 115–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.017
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Aytac, S., Bautista-Puig, N., Orduña-Malea, E., & Tran, C. Y. (2023). Contribution of carbon footprint research towards the triple bottom line of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(38), 88331–88349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28799-w
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., López-Felices, B., & Román-Sánchez, I. M. (2020). An analysis of global research trends on greenhouse technology: Towards a sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17(2), 664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020664
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Bezabih, A. M., Kahsay, Z. H., Kahsay, A., Bekele, A., Seid, O., Asfaw, S., Gebrearegay, F., Tadesse, K., Bazzano, A. N., Jogo, W., Covic, N., & Busse, H. (2022). Challenges to joint planning, monitoring, and evaluation for nutrition-sensitive agriculture in Ethiopia: An exploratory qualitative study. Agriculture and Food Security, 11(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00400-6
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Boakye Danquah, C., Acheampong, A., & Adjei-Kumi, T. (2022). Level of awareness of formwork design in the Ghanaian construction industry; enabling future technology application. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(4), 1015–1039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-12-2020-0532
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Botezat, E. A., Dodescu, A. O., Vaduva, S., & Fotea, S. L. (2018). An exploration of circular economy practices and performance among Romanian producers. Sustainability, 10(9), 3191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093191
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Bressers, H. (2007). Contextual Interaction Theory and the issue of boundary definition: Governance and the motivation, cognitions and resources of actors. In CSTM series Studies and Reports. Retrieved from https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/contextual-interaction-theory-and-the-issue-of-boundary-definitio.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Bressers, H. (2009). From public administration to policy networks: Contextual interaction analysis. In S. Nahrath & F. Varone (Eds.). Rediscovering public law and public administration in comparative policy analysis: A tribute to Peter Knoepfel (pp. 123–142). Berne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes. Retrieved from https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/from-public-administration-to-policy-networks-contextual-interact.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Bressers, H., Bressers, N., Kuks, S., & Larrue, C. (2016a). The governance assessment tool and its use. In H. Bressers, N. Bressers, & C. Larrue (Eds.). Governance for drought resilience (pp. 45–65). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29671-5_3
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Bressers, H., Bressers, N., & Larrue, C. (2016b). Governance for drought resilience: Land and water drought management in Europe. Springer Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29671-5
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Carrausse, R., & Sartre, X. A. De. (2023). Does agrivoltaism reconcile energy and agriculture ? Lessons from a French case study. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00387-3
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Carvalho, M. I. De, Relvas, S., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. (2022). A roadmap for sustainability performance assessment in the context of Agri-Food Supply Chain. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 34, 565–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.001
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Casiano Flores, C., Özerol, G., & Bressers, H. (2017). “Governance restricts”: A contextual assessment of the wastewater treatment policy in the Guadalupe River Basin, Mexico. Utilities Policy, 47, 29–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.06.006
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Castillo-Díaz, F. J., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Batlles-delaFuente, A., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2023). Impact of environmental policies on the profitability of greenhouse agriculture in southeastern Spain. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3639–3656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2616
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Cavacini, A. (2015). What is the best database for computer science journal articles? Scientometrics, 102(3), 2059–2071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1506-1
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Chatzoudes, D., Kadłubek, M., & Maditinos, D. (2024). Green logistics practices: The antecedents and effects for supply chain management in the modern era. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(3), 991–1034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2864
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Cohn, A. S., Newton, P., Gil, J. D. B., Kuhl, L., Samberg, L., Ricciardi, V., Manly, J. R., & Northrop, S. (2017). Smallholder agriculture and climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42 347–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060946
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Conijn, J. G., Bindraban, P. S., Schröder, J. J., & Jongschaap, R. E. E. (2018). Can our global food system meet food demand within planetary boundaries? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 251, 244–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.001
    View in Google Scholar
  24. de Boer, I. J. M., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2018). Circularity in Agricultural production. Wageningen University & Research. Retrieved from https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/circularity-in-agricultural-production.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. de Lauwere, C., Slegers, M., & Meeusen, M. (2022). The influence of behavioural factors and external conditions on Dutch farmers’ decision making in the transition towards circular agriculture. Land Use Policy, 120, 106253. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106253
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Department Agriculture Nature and Food. (2018). Vision agriculture, nature and food: Valuable and connected. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/ministerie-van-landbouw-natuur-en-voedselkwaliteit/documenten/beleidsnota-s/2018/09/08/visie-landbouw-natuur-en-voedsel-waardevol-en-verbonden.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Devaney, L., & Henchion, M. (2018). Who is a Delphi ‘expert’? Reflections on a bioeconomy expert selection procedure from Ireland. Futures, 99, 45–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.017
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Duque-Acevedo, M., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Terán-Yépez, E., & Camacho-Ferre, F. (2022). Sustainability and circularity in fruit and vegetable production. Perceptions and practices of reduction and valorization of agricultural waste biomass in south-eastern Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115270
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation: European Union, 100.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Elsevier. (2023). Scopus. Retrieved June 5, 2023, from https://www.elsevier.com/es-es/products/scopus.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Eneng, R., Lulofs, K., & Asdak, C. (2018). Towards a water balanced utilization through circular economy. Management Research Review, 41(5), 572–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0080
    View in Google Scholar
  32. European Commission. (2015). Communication from the Comission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Retrieved July 4, 2024, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0614.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. Retrieved July 4, 2024, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0028.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. European Commission. (2023a). European Green Deal: EU agrees stronger legislation to accelerate the rollout of renewable energy. In European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_ 2061.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. European Commission. (2023b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European data governance (Data Governance Act.). Retrieved June 12, 2024, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52020PC0767.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. European Commission. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/587 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Official Journal of the European Union 2024/587, L, 1–5. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2024/587/oj.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. European Union. (n.d.). A Circular Economy in the Netherlands by 2050 - European Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform. Retrieved July 4, 2023, from https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/en/strategies/circular-economy-netherlands-2050.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Eurostat. (2024). Crop production in EU standard humidity.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. FECYT. (2023). Scopus Database. Retrieved from https://www.recursoscientificos.fecyt.es/licencias/productos-contratados/scopus (8.11.2023).
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Franco-García, M. L., Carpio-Aguilar, J. C., & Bressers, H. (2019). The future of circular economy and zero waste. In M. Franco-García, J. Carpio-Aguilar & H. Bressers (Eds.). Towards zero waste. Greening of industry networks studies (Vol. 6, pp. 265–273). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92931-6_13
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Galati, A., Sabatino, L., Prinzivalli, C. S., D’Anna, F., & Scalenghe, R. (2020). Strawberry fields forever: That is, how many grams of plastics are used to grow a strawberry? Journal of Environmental Management, 276, 111313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111313
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Geissdoerfer, M., Santa-Maria, T., Kirchherr, J., & Pelzeter, C. (2023). Drivers and barriers for circular business model innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3814–3832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3339
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Ghazy, S., Tang, Y. H., Mugumya, K. L., Wong, J. Y., & Chan, A. (2022). Future-proofing Klang Valley’s veins with REBET: A framework for directing transportation technologies towards infrastructure resilience. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 180, 121666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121666
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Grisham, T. (2009). The Delphi technique: A method for testing complex and multifaceted topics. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(1), 112–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910930545
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Gusmão-Caiado, R. G., de Freitas-Dias, R., Veiga-Mattos, L., Gonçalves-Quelhas, O. L., & Leal-Filho, W. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency - A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 890–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Hamulczuk, M., & Pawlak, K. (2022). Determinants for international competitiveness of the food industry in 43 countries world-wide: Evidence from panel models. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 635–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.022
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Haque, F., Fan, C., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2023). From waste to value: Addressing the relevance of waste recovery to agricultural sector in line with circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, 137873. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137873
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Hartley, K., & Kirchherr, J. (2023). Circular economy: Trust the models? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106793
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Herranz de Rafael, G., & Fernandez-Prados, J. S. (2018). Intensive agriculture, marketing and social structure: The case of south-eastern Spain. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 64(8), 367–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/318/2016-AGRICECON
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Hilmi, Y. S., Tóth, J., Gabnai, Z., Király, G., & Temesi, Á. (2024). Farmers’ resilience to climate change through the circular economy and sustainable agriculture: A review from developed and developing countries. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 39, e15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170524000097
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Hoogstra, A. G., Silvius, J., de Olde, E. M., Candel, J. J. L., Termeer, C. J. A. M., van Ittersum, M. K., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2024). The transformative potential of circular agriculture initiatives in the North of the Netherlands. Agricultural Systems, 214, 103833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103833
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Hoppe, T., Kuokkanen, A., Mikkilä, M., Kahiluoto, H., Kuisma, M., Arentsen, M., & Linnanen, L. (2016). System merits or failures? Policies for transition to sustainable P and N systems in the Netherlands and Finland. Sustainability, 8(5), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050463
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., & Schösler, H. (2016). Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability, 8(1), 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010069
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University Technical Report.
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Kneese, A. V. (1988). The economics of natural resources. Population and Development Review, 14, 281–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2808100
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Kovac, N., Żmija, K., Roy, J. K., Kusa, R., & Duda, J. (2024). Digital divide and digitalization in Europe: A bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 463–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2899
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Kowalska, A., & Bieniek, M. (2022). Meeting the European green deal objective of expanding organic farming. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 607–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.021
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Landeta, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2024). Quality indicators for Delphi studies. Futures and Foresight Science, 6(1), e172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.172
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Langford, B. E., Schoenfeld, G., & Izzo, G. (2002). Nominal grouping sessions vs focus groups. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 5(1), 58–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750210414517
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Lazar, J., Feng, J. H., & Hochheiser, H. (2017). Interviews and focus groups. In Research methods in human computer interaction (pp. 187–228). Cambridge, MA : Morgan Kaufmann,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805390-4.00008-X
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Leeuwis, C., Boogaard, B. K., & Atta-Krah, K. (2021). How food systems change (or not): Governance implications for system transformation processes. Food Security, 13(4), 761–780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01178-4
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Lewandowska, A., Berniak-Woźny, J., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Competitiveness and innovation of small and medium enterprises under Industry 4.0 and 5.0 challenges: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 1045–1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.033
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2–3), 99–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Martínez-Moreno, M. M., Buitrago, E. M., Yñiguez, R., & Puig-Cabrera, M. (2024). Circular economy and agriculture: Mapping circular practices, drivers, and barriers for traditional table-olive groves. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 46, 430–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.036
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Meijer, S. S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G. W., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2015). The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13(1), 40–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Mohr, F., Diogo, V., Helfenstein, J., Debonne, N., Dimopoulos, T., Dramstad, W., García-Martín, M., Hernik, J., Herzog, F., Kizos, T., Lausch, A., Lehmann, L., Levers, C., Pazur, R., Ruiz-Aragón, V., Swart, R., Thenail, C., Ulfeng, H., Verburg, P. H., Williams, T., Zarina, A., & Bürgi, M. (2023). Why has farming in Europe changed? A farmers’ perspective on the development since the 1960s. Regional Environmental Change, 23(4), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02150-y
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Möhring, N., Finger, R., & Dalhaus, T. (2022). Extreme heat reduces insecticide use under real field conditions. Science of The Total Environment, 819, 152043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152043
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Moutinho, J. da A., Fernandes, G., & Rabechini, R. (2024). Evaluation in design science: A framework to support project studies in the context of University Research Centres. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102, 102366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102366
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Mullen, P. M. (2003). Delphi: Myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(1), 37–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Neri, A., Cagno, E., Lepri, M., & Trianni, A. (2021). A triple bottom line balanced set of key performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of industrial supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 648–691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.018
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Niyommaneerat, W., Suwanteep, K., & Chavalparit, O. (2023). Sustainability indicators to achieve a circular economy : A case study of renewable energy and plastic waste recycling corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production Journal, 391, 136203. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136203
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Nurdiana, J., Franco-Garcia, M. L., & Heldeweg, M. A. (2021). How shall we start? The importance of general indices for circular cities in Indonesia. Sustainability, 13(20), 11168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011168
    View in Google Scholar
  75. OECD. (2023). Policies for the future of farming and food in the Netherlands. OECD agriculture and food policy reviews. Paris: OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/bb16dea4-en
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Payne, A., & Kwofie, E. M. (2024). Unleashing circular economy potential in agriculture: Integrating social impact assessment with the ReSOLVE framework as a tool for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5074-5089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2952
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Robaina, M., Villar, J., & Pereira, E. T. (2020). The determinants for a circular economy in Europe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 12566–12578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07847-9
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Salinas-Velandia, D. A., Romero-Perdomo, F., Numa-Vergel, S., Villagrán, E., Donado-Godoy, P., & Galindo-Pacheco, J. R. (2022). Insights into circular horticulture: Knowledge diffusion, resource circulation, one health approach, and greenhouse technologies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912053
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Scandurra, F., Salomone, R., Caeiro, S., & de Moura, A. P. (2024). Circular economy in the agri-food sector: Insights into Portuguese companies’ practices. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 0123456789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00425-y
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Scandurra, F., Salomone, R., Caeiro, S., & Maria, T. (2023). The maturity level of the agri-food sector in the circular economy domain : A systematic literature review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 100, 107079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107079
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Schebesta, H., & Candel, J. J. L. (2020). Game-changing potential of the EU’s Farm to Fork Strategy. Nature Food, 1(10), 586–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00166-9
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The relevance of circular economy practices to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12732
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Shi, S., & Yin, J. (2021). Global research on carbon footprint: A scientometric review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106571
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Slatman, S., Mossink, A., Jansen, D., Broeks, J., van der Lugt, P., Prosman, G. J., & d’Hollosy, W. O. N. (2022). Factors used by general practitioners for referring patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study. BMC Primary Care, 23(1), 126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01743-6
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Soares, P., Suárez-Mercader, S., Comino, I., Martínez-Milán, M. A., Cavalli, S. B., & Davó-Blanes, M. C. (2021). Facilitating factors and opportunities for local food purchases in school meals in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042009
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Sreekumar, N. M., Sudheep, N. M., & Radhakrishnan, E. K. (2024). Framework for implementing circular economy in agriculture. In E. K. Radhakrishnan, A. Kumar & R. B. T.-T. P. of M. for a C. E. Aswani (Eds.). Developments in applied microbiology and biotechnology (pp. 25–52). Academic Press. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15924-4.00009-6
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Van der Meulen, H. A. B., & Berkhout, P. (2020). Food economic report 2019 of the Netherlands: Summary. The Netherlands: Wageningen Economic Research. https://doi.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/512109
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Verburg, R. W., Verberne, E., & Negro, S. O. (2022). Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands. Agricultural Systems, 198, 103368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103368
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Yang, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Msigwa, G., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P. S. (2023). Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(1), 55–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 1–7.
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Zhao, Z., Li, W., Wang, P., Tao, H., Zhou, R., Cui, J., Zhang, J., Tian, T., Zhao, X., Wang, Y., & Xiong, Y. (2023). Farmers ’ participation into the recovery of waste agricultural plastic film : An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Waste Management, 169, 253–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.06.036
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 328

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)