Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effect of corporate sustainability performance on the changes in payout policy of the top global companies

Abstract

Research background: Corporate sustainability is currently one of the most popular issues in theoretical and empirical research. It generally focuses on identifying the relationship between corporate sustainability performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP), although the CSP-CFP link is not investigated enough in the context of changes in dividend payments.

Purpose of the article: The paper aims to identify the relationship between CSP and changes in dividend payouts. To do this, a research hypothesis was formulated, stating that improving CSP in environmental, social, governance, and economic dimensions increases the propensity to pay stable dividends.

Methods: The main empirical research method is the panel logistic regression model, which includes variables of corporate sustainability. Additionally, descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficients are analyzed. The empirical research was conducted using data on the top global companies listed in the Global 500 of 2021 from the period of 2011–2021. All required data were retrieved from the Refinitiv (Thomson Reuters) Eikon database.

Findings & Value added: The main conclusion of the paper is that when all dimensions of corporate sustainability are integrated in the long run, only the strong effectiveness of corporate systems and processes inside a company make board members maintain dividends at the previous levels. It means that the research hypothesis cannot be confirmed for all corporate sustainability dimensions considered together. The value added of the paper is that the authors considered the long-term returns pillar score as one of the independent variables, which is not a commonly used approach, although economic sustainability is a key corporate sustainability dimension.

Keywords

payout policy, corporate sustainability, ESG scores

PDF

References

  1. Adjaoud, F., & Hermassi, N. (2017). The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the dividend policy of Canadian firms: empirical study. Journal of Business, Accounting and Finance, 11(1), 90–105.
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, N., & Chakraverty, A. (2023). Growth opportunities, information asymmetry, and dividend payout: Evidence from mandatory IFRS adoption. European Accounting Review, 32(1), 113–139.
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Agnese, P., Carè, R., Cerciello, M., & Taddeo, S. (2024). Reconsidering the impact of environmental, social, and governance practices on firm profitability. Management Decision.
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Alaeto, E. H. (2020). Determinants of dividend policy: Empirical evidence from Nigerian listed firms. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 13(2), 38–67.
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Aleknevičienė, V., & Vilimaitė, K. (2023). Effect of ownership structure on dividend payments: Evidence from public companies in Nordic and Baltic Countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), 1–21.
    View in Google Scholar
  6. AlGhazali, A., AlYahyaee, K. H., Fairchild, R., & Guney, Y. (2023). What do dividend changes reveal? Theory and evidence from a unique environment. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 62, 499–552.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Aluchna, M. (2015). Strategies of sustainable business. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Ananzeh, H., Khalifeh, A., Alqudah, H., Al-Ababneh, H. A., & Amosh, H. A. (2024). ESG rating, corporate dividends policy, and the moderating role of corporate life cycle: Cross country study. International Studies of Economics.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Ashrafi, M., Adams, M., Walker, T. R., & Magnan, G. (2018). How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: A theoretical review of their relationship. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(8), 672–682.
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Balcerzak, A. P., Uddin, G. S., Igliński, B., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2023). Global energy transition: From the main determinants to economic challenges. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 597–608.
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304–1320.
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Basse, T., Reddemann, S., & Gonzalez, M. R. (2024). Dividend signaling or dividend smoothing? New empirical evidence from the Italian insurance industry after the global financial crisis. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 111, 473–494.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Behl, A., Kumari, P. S. R., Makhija, H., & Sharma, D. (2022). Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analysis: Case of the Indian Energy sector. Annals of Operations Research, 313, 231–256.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Benlemlih, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 114–138.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and “the bird in the hand” fallacy. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259–270.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Bian, H., Kuo, J-M., Pan, H., & Zhang, Z. (2022). The role of managerial ownership in dividend tunneling: Evidence from China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(2), 307–333.
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Bruna, M. G., & Lahouel, B. B. (2022). CSR & financial performance: Facing methodological and modeling issues commentary paper to the eponymous FRL article collection. Finance Research Letters, 44(2), 1–8.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Buallay, A., Fadel, S. M., Alajmi, J., & Saudagaran, S. (2021). Sustainability reporting and bank performance after financial crisis: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(4), 747–770.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Casey, M. K. Jr, Casey, M. K., & Griffin, K. (2020). Does good stewardship reduce agency costs in the IT sector? Evidence from dividend policy and ESG ratings. Global Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(1), 6–15.
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Chang, H., Ishida, S., & Kochiyama, T. (2024). Management forecasting ability and predictive ability of dividend changes for future earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 39(1), 304–331.
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Che, X., & Fuller, K. P. (2020). What does the timing of dividend reductions signal? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 55(3), 1035–1061.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Cheung, A. W., Hu, M., & Schwiebert, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy. Accounting and Finance, 58, 787–816.
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Chowdhury, S. B., DasGupta, R., Choudhury, B. K., & Sen, N. (2023). Evolving alliance between corporate environmental performance and financial performance: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Business and Society Review, 128(1), 95–131.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Deng, X., Groote, S. D., & Li, C. K. (2024). Dividend signalling and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 20, 1–14.
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Dewasiri, N. J., Koralalage, W. B., Azeez, A. A., Jayarathne, P. G., Kuruppuarachchi, D., & Weerasinghe, V. A. (2019). Determinants of dividend policy: Evidence from an emerging and developing market. Managerial Finance, 45(3), 413–429.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Douissa, I. B., & Azrak, T. (2022). Long-run dynamics between CFP and CSP in the GCC banking sector: Estimation non-statutory heterogeneous panels allowing for cross-sectional dependence. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(3), 518–533.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Ellili, N. O. D. (2022). Impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on dividend policy: What is the role of corporate governance? Evidence from an emerging market. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1–18.
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Fooladi, M. (2012). Board characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(5), 688-694.
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Gawęda, A. (2022). ESG rating and market valuation of the firm: Sector approach. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(4), 91.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Ghose, B., Baruah, D., & Gope, K. (2022). Propensity to propose and pay dividend: Does firm characteristics matter? Global Business Review.
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L.T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 1–34.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Giovannoni, E., & Fabietti, G. (2013). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. In C. Busco, M. L. Frigo, P. Quattrone, & A. Riccaboni (Eds.). Integrated reporting: Concepts and cases that redefine corporate accountability (pp. 21–40). Berlin: Springer.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Gond, J., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223.
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Hu, Y., Huang, W., & Chen, Z. (2020). Stock liquidity, agency cost, and dividend payouts. Applied Economics Letters, 27(4), 335–339.
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Huang, L., Li, L., Wang, H., & Wu, L. (2022). Stock dividend and analyst optimistic bias in earnings forecast. International Review of Economics and Finance, 78, 643–659.
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Jha, M. K., & Rangarajan, K. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–30.
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Kantabutra, S., & Ketprapakorn, N. (2020). Toward a theory of corporate sustainability: A theoretical integration and exploration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 1–22.
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Kaur, J., & Kaur, K. (2024). Board composition, ownership structure and dividend policy: Evidence from NSE listed companies in India. International Journal of Law and Management.
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta-analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668.
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Knežević, B., & Škrobot, P. (2021). Sustainable development in corporate strategy. In M. Stefańska (Ed.). Sustainability and sustainable development (pp. 71–82). Poznan: PUEB Poznan University of Economics and Business.
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Li, L., Saat, M. M., Khatib, S. F. A., Chu, P., & Sulimany, H. G. H. (2024a). Navigating the impact: A comprehensive analysis of ESG disclosure consequences through systematic review. Business Strategy & Development, 7(2), 1025.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Li, T. Y., Mao, Y., & Turvey, C. G. (2024b). Buffer or bluffing: Examining the relation between ESG and corporate financial performance of Chinese A-share firms. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business Research Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5043228.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Lin, J. J., & Lee, C. F. (2021). Does managerial reluctance of dividend cuts signal future earnings? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 56, 453–478.
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Lin, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, F., & Dong, Z. (2024). Who is more likely to become a sustainable corporation? An empirical research based on corporate sustainability performance. Sustainable Development.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Liu, Y.-Y., & Lee, P.-S. (2025). The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance on the duration of dividend sustainability: A survival analysis. Managerial Finance, 51(2), 337–352.
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Louziri, R., & Oubal, K. (2022). Determinants of dividend policy: The case of the Casablanca Stock Exchange. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(548), 1–19.
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Lu, L., & Taylor, M. (2016). Which factors moderate the relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance? A meta-analysis study. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–15.
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Matos, P. V., Barros, V., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). Does ESG affect the stability of dividend policies in Europe? Sustainability, 12(21), 1–15.
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–21.
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Niccolò, N., Battisti, E., Papa, A., & Miglietta, N. (2020). Shareholder value and dividend policy: The role of ESG strategies. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE international conference on technology management, operations and fecisions (ICTMOD) (pp. 29–33.) Marrakech: IEEE.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Nizam, E., Ng, A., Dewandaru, G., Nagayev, R., & Nikoba, M. A. (2019). The impact of social and environmental sustainability on financial performance: A global analysis of the banking sector. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 49, 35–53.
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400–407.
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Oželienė, D. (2017). A review of enterprise sustainable development models: Critical appraisal. International Scientific Journal “Science. Business. Society”, 2(2), 97–103.
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 59–76.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Rau, P. R., & Yu, T. (2023). A survey on ESG: Investor, institutions and firms. China Finance Review International.
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Robles-Elorza, D., San-Jose, L., & Urionabarrenetxea, S. (2023). Deep-diving into the relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: A comprehensive investigation of previous research. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 29(2), 100209.
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Salvi, A., Nirino, N., Battisti, N., & Gianfrancesco, I. (2024). Payout policy and ESG: A European investigation. Research in International Business and Finance, 68, 1–10.
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Samet, M., & Jarboui, A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and payout decisions. Managerial Finance, 43(9), 982–998.
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Sanders, N. R., Wood, J. D. (2015). Foundations of sustainable business. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Setiawan, S., Wahyudi, S., & Muharam, H. (2024). Determinants of bank’s dividend policy: A life cycle theory test in Indonesia. Managerial Finance, 50(8), 1409–1423.
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Singh, R., Gupta, C. P., & Chaudhary, P. (2023). Dividend policy and corporate life cycle: A study of Indian companies. Managerial Finance, 49(11), 1722–1749.
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Singhania, M., & Saini, N. (2022). Quantification of ESG regulations: A cross-country benchmarking analysis. Vision, 26(2), 163–171.
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Soana, M-G. (2011). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance in the bank sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 133–148.
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Souza, W. D., Hijazi, M. M., & Silva, T. P. (2024). Determinants of dividend payout policy: More evidence from emerging markets of G20 Bloc. International Journal of Finance & Economics.
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Sultan, S. A. M., Wan Ahmad, W. M., Bacha, O. I., & Ramlee, R. (2024). Impact of corporate social performance on financial performance: Evidence from Islamic banks, conventional banks, and social banks. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 16(2), 110–132.
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Sustainable Development Solution Network (SDSN). (2013). An action agenda for sustainable development. New York, NY: UN.
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Sustainable Development Solution Network (SDSN). (2024). The SDGs and the UN summit of the future. Sustainable development report 2024. Dublin: UN.
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Tuppura, A., Arminen, H., Pätäri, S., & Jantunen, A. (2016). Corporate social and financial performance in different industry contexts: The chicken or the egg? Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 672–686.
    View in Google Scholar
  74. United Nations (UN). (2012). Future we want. Rio de Janeiro: UN.
    View in Google Scholar
  75. United Nations (UN). (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: UN.
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Vargas‐Santander, K. G., Álvarez‐Diez, S., Baixauli‐Soler, S., & Belda‐Ruiz, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Does country sustainability matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), 3075–3094.
    View in Google Scholar
  77. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Xiao, C., Wang, Q., van der Vaart, T., & van Donk, D. P. (2018). When does corporate sustainability performance pay off? The impact of country-level sustainability performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 325–333.
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Zhao, K. M. (2023). Signaling or tunneling: The dividend policies of Chinese ADRs listed in the US. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 19(5), 1203–1224.
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Ziegler, A., Schröder, M., & Rennings, K. (2007). The effects of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(4), 661–680.
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 199

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.