Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model in the analysis of citizen satisfaction in depopulated regions: Implications for sustainable long term rural development policy

Abstract

Research background: Understanding the cognitive processes used by citizens to form their satisfaction is essential in the design of sustainable rural policies. This research holds significant relevance for other countries facing rural depopulation, governance and demographic challenges. The authors apply the Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model (EDM) to explain citizen satisfaction with rural development policies, considering the unique challenges and expectations of rural communities.

Purpose of the article: The authors investigate the EDM capacity to explain satisfaction in the under-researched rural context. Incorporating a territorial perspective into the study of satisfaction may offer a better understanding of the decision-making processes rural citizens use to make evaluations of government policies. In addition, it is interesting to address the lack of consensus on the ability of expectations to act as a predictor of citizen satisfaction and the insufficient attention paid to the distinction between normative and predictive expectations.

Methods: The article is based on the results of a survey to rural citizens of the so-called "Hollowed-out Spain”. The authors apply the Structural Equation Modelling methodology to estimate two alternative models that explain the behavior of the variable satisfaction. These two models differ in the variable used to measure expectations.

Findings & value added: The results obtained allow us to affirm that the EDM acceptably adapts to the rural context. Perceived disconfirmation exerts the largest effect on satisfaction. The central prediction of the EDM that expectations are a primary driver of satisfaction is not confirmed, although empirical expectations do improve the performance of the model. Some governance implications arise: only if expectations are considered will investments in improving a public service impact positively on citizen satisfaction. Administrations may attempt to influence such expectations, albeit deploying an ethical approach. Enhancing transparency could be useful to reduce dissonances between actual performance and that perceived by citizens.

Keywords

Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model, Rural development policy, Depopulation, Citizen satisfaction survey

PDF

References

  1. Alonso-Carrillo, I., Pérez-Morote, R., Núñez-Chicharro, M., & Pontones-Rosa, C. (2023). Do citizens in Spanish municipalities have the same perception of the solution to depopulation? Influence of population size. Cities, 135, 104210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104210
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, S. C., & Hjortskov, M. (2016). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 647–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv036
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Bellé, N., Belardinelli, P., Cucciniello, M., & Nasi, G. (2025). Experimental evidence on the determinants of citizens’ expectations toward public services. Public Administration Review, 85(1), 176–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13775
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Bertram, I., Bouwman, R., & Tummers, L. (2024). Getting what you expect: How civil servant stereotypes affect citizen satisfaction and perceived performance. Public Administration, 102(4), 1468–1491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12986
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bhuvana, M., & Vasantha, S. (2022). Determinants of e-governance health care services requirements and rural citizen satisfaction In B. R. Rajagopal (Eds.). Managing disruptions in business. Palgrave studies in democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for growth (pp. 317–334). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79709-6_16
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2016). Dysfunctional state institutions, trust, and governance in areas of limited statehood. Regulation and Governance, 10(2), 149–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12100
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Brinkerhoff, D. W., Wetterberg, A., & Wibbels, E. (2018). Distance, services, and citizen perceptions of the state in rural Africa. Governance, 31(1), 103–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12271
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Camarero, L., & Oliva, J. (2019). Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0306-x
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Cowell, R., Downe, J., Martin, S., & Chen, A. (2012). Public confidence and public services: It matters what you measure. Policy and Politics, 40(1), 120–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/147084411X581862
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Dvir, R., Liu, X., Geva, N., & Vedlitz, A. (2024). The multi-dimensionality of citizen satisfaction: A conjoint experimental approach. Public Policy and Administration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241287615
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Engdaw, B. D. (2020). The impact of quality public service delivery on customer satisfaction in Bahir Dar city administration: The case of Ginbot 20 sub-city. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(7), 644–654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644520
    View in Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2021). A long-term vision for the EU’s rural areas—towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. European Network for Rural development (ENRD). (2021). Rural voices. A qualitative analysis of the findings from stakeholder workshops contributing to the long-term vision for rural areas. European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Eurostat. (2025). Rural Europe. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Rural_Europe.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Favero, N., & Kim, M. (2021). Everything is relative: How citizens form and Use expectations in evaluating services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 561–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa048
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Filtenborg, A. F., Gaardboe, F., & Sigsgaard-Rasmussen, J. (2017). Experimental replication: An experimental test of the expectancy disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1235–1250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1295099
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Folz, D. H. (1996). Survey research for public administration. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327570
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Geng, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, N., Li, J., & Yan, Y. (2024). Sustainable rural development: Differentiated paths to achieve rural revitalization with case of Western China. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 31507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83339-x
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Porumbescu, G. A. (2017). Reconsidering the expectancy disconfirmation model. Three experimental replications. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1272–1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1282000
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Gupta, A. K., & Shrestha, G. L. (2021). Citizen charter in Nepali public sector organizations: Does it really work?. Policy and Governance Review, 5(1), 18–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v5i1.368
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Hjortskov, M. (2019). Citizen expectations and satisfaction over time: Findings from a large sample panel survey of public school parents in Denmark. American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 353–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018765822
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Hong, P., & Cui, M. (2024). Discrepancies in parent-adolescent educational and career expectations and overparenting. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(2), 435–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231177865
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Hoogerbrugge, M. M., Burger, M. J., & Van Oort, F. G. (2021). Spatial structure and subjective well-being in North-West Europe. Regional Studies, 56, 75–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1873261
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Hubatková, B. (2019). Older adults’ well-being by the type of residential setting: The case of small municipalities in the Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies 72, 196–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.026
    View in Google Scholar
  27. James, O. (2009). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 107–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum034
    View in Google Scholar
  28. James, O. (2011). Managing citizens' expectations of public service performance: Evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–1435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01962.x
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Jilke, S., & Baekgaard, M. (2020). The political psychology of citizen satisfaction: Does functional responsibility matter?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 130–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz012
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 15215–15222). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00776-2
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Kelly, J. M., & Swindell, D. (2003). The case for the inexperienced user: Rethinking filter questions in citizen satisfaction surveys. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 91–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074002250256
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Kumlin, S., Nemčok, M., & Van Hootegem, A. (2024). Welfare state evaluations, normative expectations, and political trust: Longitudinal evidence from Germany and Norway. Public Management Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2297292
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Labianca, M. (2021). Towards a visionary approach for rural areas. From the key features to planning the future of LEADER. Universitá del Salento Perspectives on rural development, 5.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Lamsal, B. P., & Gupta, A. K. (2022). Citizen satisfaction with public service: What factors drive?. Policy and Governance Review, 6(1), 78–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v6i1.470
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Lee, C. P., Hung, M. J., & Chen, D. Y. (2022). Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: Examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 35–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2022.2047081
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Lenzi, C., & Perucca, G. (2020). Not too close, not too far: Urbanisation and life satisfaction along the urban hierarchy. Urban Studies, 58, 2742–2757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020962397
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Luoma aho, V., Olkkonen, L., & Canel, M. J. (2020). Public sector communication and citizen expectations and satisfaction. In V. Luoma-aho & M. J. Canel (Eds.). The handbook of public sector communication. Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Memo, U., & Pieńkowski, D. (2023). Sustainable rural development indicators in Bulgaria, Germany, Poland, Romania and the Netherlands: A review of data. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1323688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1323688
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Merkle, E. C., You, D., & Preacher, K. J. (2016). Testing nonnested structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000038
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Mitsch, F., Lee, N., & Morrow, E. R. (2021). Faith no more? The divergence of political trust between urban and rural Europe. Political Geography, 89, 102426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102426
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Morgeson, F. V. (2013). Expectations, disconfirmation, and citizen satisfaction with the US federal government: Testing and expanding the model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 289–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus012
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Noda, Y. (2019). Citizen expectations and satisfaction of service performance: Lessons from subnational governments in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 142–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2019.1658361
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Nogueira, S. P., Ribeiro, N., & Remondes, S. (2023, May). Analysis of citizen satisfaction in municipal services. In International conference on management, tourism and technologies (pp. 289–299). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43733-5_26
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Ochoa-Rico, M. S., Río, J. A. J. D., Romero-Subia, J. F., & Vergara-Romero, A. (2024). Study of citizen satisfaction in rural versus urban areas in public services: Perspective of a multi-group analysis. Social Indicators Research, 171(1), 87–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03242-2
    View in Google Scholar
  45. OECD. (2019). OECD’s principles on rural policy. OECD.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. OECD. (2023). Shrinking smartly and sustainably 2023-2025. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/demographic-change-in-regions.html.
    View in Google Scholar
  47. OECD. (2024). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions – 2024 results: Building trust in a complex policy environment. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Oliver, R. L., (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Petrovsky, N., Mok, J. Y., & León‐Cázares, F. (2017). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: A test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 395–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12623
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Petrowsky, N., Yu, J., & Walker, R. M. (2023). Job satisfaction and citizen satisfaction with street-level bureaucrats: Is there a satisfaction mirror? Public Management Review, 33(2), 279–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac022
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Poister, T. H., & Thomas, J. C. (2011). The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on motorists’ satisfaction with state highways. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 601–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur004
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Pontones-Rosa, C., Pérez-Morote, R., Alonso-Carrillo, I., & Santos Peñalver, J. F. (2024). ICT development and depopulation: Exploring the effects of municipal size on citizens’ technological profiles and policy evaluation in rural Spain. Information Technology for Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2361483
    View in Google Scholar
  54. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Roch, C. H., & Poister, T. H. (2006). Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction: The influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 292–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405281124
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Romero-Subia, J. F., Jimber-del Rio, J. A., Ochoa-Rico, M. S., & Vergara-Romero, A. (2022). Analysis of citizen satisfaction in municipal services. Economies, 10(9), 225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10090225
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Sánchez, L. (2019). Planning territorial policies against inner areas depopulation in Spain: Keys for sustainable management of cultural and environmental resources. Il capitale culturale. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage, 19, 53–81.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000302
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Stipak, B. (1977). Attitudes and belief systems concerning urban services. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41(1), 41–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/268351
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Van de Walle, S., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: Lessons from a split‐ballot experiment. Public Administration, 89(4), 1436–1450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01922.x
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Van de Walle, S. V. (2018). Explaining citizen satisfaction and dissatisfaction with public services. In E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (Eds). The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 227–241). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_11
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Van der Voet, J., & van den Bekerom, P. (2024). Performance information, expectations and satisfaction with public service delivery in the context of co-production initiatives. Public Management Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2392131
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20020
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui058
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21702
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Wang, H., Fan, J., & Zhang, X. (2022). A general equilibrium analysis of achieving the goal of stable growth by China’s market expectations in the context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(22), 15072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215072
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Weng, L., Tan, L., & Yu, Y. (2023). The effects of perceived cultural and tourism public services on visitor satisfaction and quality of life: A multiple mediation model. Land, 12(11), 2033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112033
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Xiang, L., & Stillwell, J. (2023). Rural–urban educational inequalities and their spatial variations in China. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 16(2), 873–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09506-1
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Yi, Y. (1993). The determinants of consumer satisfaction: The moderating role of ambiguity. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 502–506.
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2022). The expectancy‐disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction with public services: A meta‐analysis and an agenda for best practice. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 147–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13368
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 409

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.