Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Digital readiness across the European Union: A multidimensional empirical assessment of structural determinants, intra-regional disparities, and strategic implications in the era of Industry 5.0

Abstract

Research background: Digital transformation across the European Union (EU) has become a critical driver of economic competitiveness and societal development. However, there are still notable differences in member states’ infrastructure, governance, and level of digital preparedness. Interest in setting the primary factors that determine digital maturity and understanding the structural disparities in the EU’s digital landscape is developing as a result of Industry 5.0, which places a high priority on human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience.

Purpose of the article: The objective of this article is to evaluate the digital preparedness of EU member states by using the most recent Network Readiness Index (NRI) data for 2024. It aims to determine the factors that have the most significant impact on the overall digital performance, evaluate the disparities between countries in the quartiles of the NRI rankings, and visualize the current status of digital transformation throughout the EU. This research further contextualizes the findings within the shift from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0.

Methods: The study applies a combination of multivariate and inferential statistical techniques. A segmentation map is used to visually group countries by digital performance. Stacked bar graphs illustrate the importance of specific NRI components to overall scores. An independent sample t-test is performed to assess significant differences between high-performing and moderately performing countries. A regression study determines the primary predictors of overall digital readiness.

Findings & value added: The study indicates significant variability in the structure and determinants of digital readiness among EU nations. Research and development (R&D) investment, household Internet access, and GDP per capita in purchasing power standards (PPS) are considered the most reliable indicators of digital success. Statistically significant differences were established between the first and second quartiles across various parameters of the NRI. This study improves the literature by delivering a thorough empirical evaluation of the 2024 NRI data and presenting practical recommendations for policymakers aiming to promote fair and sustainable digital transformation in accordance with Industry 5.0 principles.

Keywords

digital readiness, Network Readiness Index, Industry 5.0, regional disparities, digital transformation policy

PDF

References

  1. Adel, A., & Alani, N. H. (2024). Human-centric collaboration and Industry 5.0 framework in smart cities and communities: Fostering sustainable development goals 3, 4, 9, and 11 in Society 5.0. Smart Cities, 7(4), 1723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040068
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Arranz, C. F., Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2023). Digitalisation dynamics in SMEs: An approach from systems dynamics and artificial intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122880
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Ashok, K., Boddu, R., Ali Syed, S., Sonawane, V. R., Dabhade, R. G., & Shaker Reddy, P. C. (2023). GAN Base feedback analysis system for industrial IOT networks. Automatika: Časopis za Automatiku, Mjerenje, Elektroniku, Računarstvo i Komunikacije, 64(2), 259–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00051144.2022.2140391
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of information and communication technologies on democratic processes and citizen participation. Societies, 15(2), 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Ayanwale, M. A., Molefi, R. R., & Oyeniran, S. (2024). Analyzing the evolution of machine learning integration in educational research: A bibliometric perspective. Discover Education, 3(1), 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00119-5
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bakari, S. (2024). The role of digitalization, natural resources, and trade openness in driving economic growth: Fresh insights from East Asia-Pacific Countries. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121643/.
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Baker, N. B., Said Boustany, M., Khater, M., & Haddad, C. (2020). Measuring the indirect effect of the Internet on the relationship between human capital and labor productivity. International Review of Applied Economics, 34(6), 821–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2020.1792421
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Bandopadhyay, B., Mallick, N., & Bandopadhyay, R. (2025). Access to the internet as a 4th generation of human rights: A critical analysis with special reference to children's education during the covid-19 pandemic. In COVID-19 and public policy (Vol. 33) (pp. 213–228). Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-832320240000033014
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Bánhidi, Z., & Dobos, I. (2024). Measuring digital development: Ranking using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and network readiness index (NRI). Central European Journal of Operations Research, 32(4), 1089–1108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-024-00919-y
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Bánhidi, Z., Tokmergenova, M., & Dobos, I. (2023). A Network Readiness Index (NRI). Statisztikai Szemle, 101(7), 618–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20311/stat2023.07.hu0618
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Barboutidis, G., & Stiakakis, E. (2022). Digitization and international development: A descriptive analysis of the Networked Readiness Index in eight European Union countries. In Springer briefs in well-being and quality of life research (pp. 53–79). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04711-4_3
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Biçakçi, A. S. (2023). Digital Europe Program: Nurturing technological sovereignty for a resilient European digital ecosphere. Ankara Avrupa Calismalari Dergisi, 23, 135–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.1439811
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Bisciari, P., Butzen, P., Gelade, W., Melyn, W., & Van Parys, S. (2021). The EU budget and the Next Generation EU Recovery Plan: A game changer. NBB Economic Review, 2, 29–67.
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Borowiecki, R., Siuta-Tokarska, B., Maroń, J., Suder, M., Thier, A., & Żmija, K. (2021). Developing digital economy and society in the light of the issue of digital convergence of the markets in the European Union countries. Energies, 14(9), 2717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092717
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Brunetti, F., Matt, D. T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G., & Orzes, G. (2020). Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. TQM Journal, 32(4), 697–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0309
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Bucci, I., Fani, V., & Bandinelli, R. (2024). Towards human-centric manufacturing: Exploring the role of human digital twins in Industry 5.0. Sustainability, 17(1), 129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010129
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Castellani, D., Lamperti, F., & Lavoratori, K. (2022). Measuring adoption of industry 4.0 technologies via international trade data: Insights from European countries. Journal of Industrial and Business Eocnomics, 49, 51–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-021-00204-y
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Capestro, M., Rizzo, C., Kliestik, T., Peluso, A. M., & Pino, G. (2024). Enabling digital technologies adoption in industrial districts: The key role of trust and knowledge sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 123003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123003
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Carbonaro, A., Breen, J. M., & Piccinini, F. (2022). A new digital divide threatening resilience: Exploring the need for educational, firm-based, and societal investments in ICT human capital. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 66–73.
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Chan, J. Y. L., Leow, S. M. H., Bea, K. T., Cheng, W. K., Phoong, S. W., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Mitigating the multicollinearity problem and its machine learning approach: A review. Mathematics, 10(8), 1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081283
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Chatterjee, S., Kliestik, T., Rowland, Z., & Bugaj, M. (2025). Immersive collaborative business process and extended reality-driven industrial metaverse technologies for economic value co-creation in 3D digital twin factories. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(1),125–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3596
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Chetty, K., Qigui, L., Gcora, N., Josie, J., Wenwei, L., & Fang, C. (2018). Bridging the digital divide: Measuring digital literacy. Economics, 12(1), 20180023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-23
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Cichosz, M., Wallenburg, C. M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2020). Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices. International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(2), 209–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Codagnone, C., Liva, G., Barcevičius, E., Misuraca, G., Klimavičiūtė, L., Benedetti, M., & Gunashekar, S. (2020). Assessing the impacts of digital government transformation in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., & Irani, Z. (2017). Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries. Information Systems Frontiers, 19, 835–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9634-1
    View in Google Scholar
  26. David, L. K., Wang, J., Brooks, W., & Angel, V. (2025). Digital transformation and socio-economic development in emerging economies: A multinational analysis. Technology in Society, 81, 102834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102834
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Day, M. (2024). The Network Readiness Index (2019–2023): A theoretical and critical analysis. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 18(1), 81–101.
    View in Google Scholar
  28. De Figueiredo, S. A. (2024). Digital readiness and economic growth : Analyzing the Impact of DESI Scores on GDP in European Countries. Economy & Finance, 11(3), 282–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33908/EF.2024.3.3
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Dellaert, B. G. (2019). The consumer production journey: Marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 238–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0607-4
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2019). The network readiness index 2019. Washington: Portulans Institute.
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Esteban-Navarro, M.-Á., García-Madurga, M.-Á., Morte-Nadal, T., & Nogales-Bocio, A.-I. (2020). The rural digital divide in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe—Recommendations from a scoping review. Informatics, 7(4), 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7040054
    View in Google Scholar
  33. European Commission. (2022). 2030 Digital Compass: The European way for the digital decade. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: SAGE Publications.
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Figueiredo, P. N. (2023). National innovation strategy: A brief contribution to its effectiveness from the perspective of technological capability accumulation. Revista de Administração Pública, 57, e2022-0418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220418x
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Flores, E., Xu, X., & Lu, Y. (2020). Human capital 4.0: A workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(4), 687–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2019-0309
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Frajtova Michalíkova, K., Imam, H., Pobee, F., & Rozhan, S. M. B. (2024). Comparative analysis of key personal traits of SME owners and managers. A perspective from business sectors. Journal of Business Sectors, 2(2), 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62222/PSRV2054
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Gallo, P., Kusnirova, R., Kollmann, J., & Dobrovic. J. (2024). Utilization of the HR Scorecard in potential development and learning growth, Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 18(2), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26552/ems.2024.2.1-13
    View in Google Scholar
  39. Gherghin, C. A. (2025). Public policies for the digitalization of public services in the European Union: From foundations to contemporary challenges. Technium Social Science Journal , 67, 528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v67i1.12453
    View in Google Scholar
  40. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
    View in Google Scholar
  41. Giotopoulos, I., Kontolaimou, A., & Tsakanikas, A. (2022). Digital responses of SMEs to the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(7), 1751–1772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2021-0924
    View in Google Scholar
  42. Grigorescu, A., Pelinescu, E., Ion, A. E., & Dutcas, M. F. (2021). Human capital in digital economy: An empirical analysis of central and eastern European countries from the European Union. Sustainability, 13(4), 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042020
    View in Google Scholar
  43. Hou, B., Wei, C., Liu, X., Meng, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Assessing forest landscape stability through automatic identification of landscape pattern evolution in Shanxi Province of China. Remote Sensing, 15(3), 545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030545
    View in Google Scholar
  44. Islam, M. T., Sepanloo, K., Woo, S., Woo, S. H., & Son, Y. J. (2025). A review of the Industry 4.0 to 5.0 transition: Exploring the intersection, challenges, and opportunities of technology and human–machine collaboration. Machines, 13(4), 267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13040267
    View in Google Scholar
  45. Joint Research Centre (JRC). (2024). COIN Network Readiness Index 2024: Statistical audit. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    View in Google Scholar
  46. Juracka, D., Nagy, M., Zvarikova, K., & Popescu, G. (2024). Eco-innovation: Analysis of EU member states performance in the EU Eco-innovation index 2013–2022. Systems, 12(11), 452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110452
    View in Google Scholar
  47. Kalina, J. (2024). Statistical method selection matters: Vanilla methods in regression may yield misleading results. Inproforum, 17(1), 5–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32725/978-80-7694-053-6.63
    View in Google Scholar
  48. Kayser, K., Telukdarie, A., & Philbin, S. P. (2023). Digital start-up ecosystems: A systematic literature review and model development for South Africa. Sustainability, 15(16), 12513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612513
    View in Google Scholar
  49. Khan, D. M., Yaqoob, A., Zubair, S., Khan, M. A., Ahmad, Z., & Alamri, O. A. (2021). Applications of robust regression techniques: An econometric approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021(1), 6525079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6525079
    View in Google Scholar
  50. Kim, J., & Ahn, S. (2025). The platform policy matrix: Promotion and regulation. Policy & Internet, 17(1), e414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.414
    View in Google Scholar
  51. Kliestik, T., Kral, P., Bugaj, M., & Durana, P. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence of things systems, multisensory immersive extended reality technologies, and algorithmic big data simulation and modelling tools in digital twin industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 429–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3108
    View in Google Scholar
  52. Kosikova, M., & Matovcikova, D. (2024). The impact of digital quality of life on artificial intelligence development: A case study using the DQL and AIRI indexes, Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 18(2), 24–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26552/ems.2024.2.24-37
    View in Google Scholar
  53. Kovacs, T. Z., Nabradi, A., & Bittner, B. (2023). Digital technology integration among Eastern European companies, based on Digital Economy and Society Index. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 21(5), 421–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.21.5.1
    View in Google Scholar
  54. Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 11(3), 21582440211047576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576
    View in Google Scholar
  55. Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Aktas, E., Narkhede, B. E., & Gedam, V. V. (2023). Barriers to adoption of industry 4.0 and sustainability: A case study with SMEs. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36(5), 657–677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2128217
    View in Google Scholar
  56. Kwilinski, A., Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2024). Digital public services: Catalysts for healthcare efficiency. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100319
    View in Google Scholar
  57. Lewandowska, A., Berniak-Woźny, J., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Competitiveness and innovation of small and medium enterprises under Industry 4.0 and 5.0 challenges: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 1045–1074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.033
    View in Google Scholar
  58. Lundgren, A., Cuadrado, A., Wøien Meijer, M., Sigurjónsdóttir, H. R., Turunen, E., Salenius, V., Teras,k L., Gefke Grelck, J. B, & Lundvall Berg, S. (2020). Skills policies: Building capacities for innovative and resilient Nordic regions. Stockholm: Nordregio.
    View in Google Scholar
  59. Lyubareva, I., & Waldeck, R. (Eds.). (2023). Diversity of methodological approaches in social sciences: Example of the analysis of media and online information. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394236565
    View in Google Scholar
  60. Malkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosala, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 353–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.012
    View in Google Scholar
  61. Marcus, J. S., & Rossi, M. A. (2024). Strengthening EU digital competitiveness: Stoking the engine. Fiesole: European University Institute.
    View in Google Scholar
  62. Marti, L., & Puertas, R. (2023). Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Technology in Society, 72, 102206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102206
    View in Google Scholar
  63. Martinez-Cantos, J. L. (2017). Digital skills gaps: A pending subject for gender digital inclusion in the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 32(5), 419–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117718464
    View in Google Scholar
  64. Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12343
    View in Google Scholar
  65. Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203815991
    View in Google Scholar
  66. Modgil, S., Singh, R. K., & Agrawal, S. (2023). Developing human capabilities for supply chains: An industry 5.0 perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05245-1
    View in Google Scholar
  67. Moirangthem, N. S., & Nag, B. (2022). Measuring regional competitiveness on the basis of entrepreneurship, technological readiness and quality of institutions. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(1), 103–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2020-0139
    View in Google Scholar
  68. Mubarak, F., Suomi, R., & Kantola, S. (2020). Confirming the links between socio-economic variables and digitalization worldwide: The unsettled debate on digital divide. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(3), 415–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2019-0021
    View in Google Scholar
  69. Nagy, M., Figura, M., Valaskova, K., & Lăzăroiu, G. (2025). Predictive maintenance algorithms, artificial intelligence digital twin technologies, and internet of robotic things in big data-driven Industry 4.0 manufacturing systems. Mathematics, 13(6), 981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math13060981
    View in Google Scholar
  70. Nagy, M., Lăzăroiu, G., & Valaskova, K. (2023). Machine intelligence and autonomous robotic technologies in the corporate context of SMEs: Deep learning and virtual simulation algorithms, cyber-physical production networks, and Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031681
    View in Google Scholar
  71. Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
    View in Google Scholar
  72. Natário, M. M. S., Couto, J. P. A., Abreu, R., De Oliveira, P. M. D. D., & Rei, C. M. (2024). Innovation dynamics in European countries post COVID-19. In Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series (pp. 385–408). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5777-4.ch015
    View in Google Scholar
  73. Novikova, I., & Liebert, S. (2021). Citizens’ perception of government responsiveness: Building an engaged citizenry. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 298–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2021.1966815
    View in Google Scholar
  74. Omweri, F. S. (2024). A systematic literature review of e-government implementation in developing countries: Examining urban-rural disparities, institutional capacity, and socio-cultural factors in the context of local governance and progress towards SDG 16.6. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 1173–1199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.808088
    View in Google Scholar
  75. Pacheco, D. A. D. J., & Iwaszczenko, B. (2024). Unravelling human-centric tensions towards Industry 5.0: Literature review, resolution strategies and research agenda. Digital Business, 100090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100090
    View in Google Scholar
  76. Petry, L., Lins, S., Thiebes, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021). Technologieauswahl im DigitalPakt: Wie werden Entscheidungen im Bildungssektor getroffen? HMD Praxis Der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 59(3), 912–925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-021-00751-x
    View in Google Scholar
  77. Pisu, M., Von Rüden, C., Hwang, H., & Nicoletti, G. (2021). Spurring growth and closing gaps through digitalisation in a post-COVID world: Policies to LIFT all boats. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    View in Google Scholar
  78. Portulans Institute. (2024). Network Readiness Index 2024: Shaping the future of the digital economy. Washington,: Portulans Institute.
    View in Google Scholar
  79. Pratipatti, S., & Gomaa, A. (2019). A longitudinal analysis of the impact of the indicators in the networked readiness index (NRI). Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 28(2), 17–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1407
    View in Google Scholar
  80. Qazi, A. (2025). Prioritizing factors influencing global Network Readiness Index with Bayesian belief networks. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100522
    View in Google Scholar
  81. Qazi, A., & Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S. (2024). Exploring critical drivers of global innovation: A Bayesian network perspective. Knowledge-Based Systems, 299, 112127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112127
    View in Google Scholar
  82. Rajasekaran, S., & Casap, L. (2022). Moldova–digital education readiness assessment 2021-22. Washington: World Bank Group.
    View in Google Scholar
  83. Rame, R., Purwanto, P., & Sudarno, S. (2024). Industry 5.0 and sustainability: An overview of emerging trends and challenges for a green future. Innovation and Green Development, 3(4), 100173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100173
    View in Google Scholar
  84. Randall, L., Berlina, A., Teräs, J., & Rinne, T. (2018). Digitalisation as a tool for sustainable Nordic regional development. Stockholh: Nordregio.
    View in Google Scholar
  85. Remeikiene, R., Gaspareniene, L., & Cesiulyte, J. (2025). Work organization and social responsibility on digital platforms: Challenges and best practices in Europe. Journal of Business Sectors, 3(1), 25–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62222/TDGY8465
    View in Google Scholar
  86. Roberts, E., Anderson, B. A., Skerratt, S., & Farrington, J. (2017). A review of the rural-digital policy agenda from a community resilience perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 372–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.001
    View in Google Scholar
  87. Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Pleśniarska, A., & Grzelak, M. M. (2024). Determinants of digital economy development in the EU member states: The role of technological infrastructure, human capital, and innovation (2017-2022). Ekonomia i Prawo, 23(4), 611–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2024.31
    View in Google Scholar
  88. Ruiu, M. L., & Ragnedda, M. (2024). Digital-environmental poverty: Digital and environmental inequalities in the post-covid era. Cham: Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56184-9
    View in Google Scholar
  89. Senna, P. P., Roca, J. B., & Barros, A. C. (2023). Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122822
    View in Google Scholar
  90. Shahzad, M. U. (2024). Core competencies for digital leadership development: A perspective from the lens of paradox theory. Bottom Line, 37(4), 454–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-10-2023-0278
    View in Google Scholar
  91. Silva, D. S., Yamashita, G. H., Cortimiglia, M. N., Brust-Renck, P. G., & ten Caten, C. S. (2022). Are we ready to assess digital readiness? Exploring digital implications for social progress from the Network Readiness Index. Technology in Society, 68, 101875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101875
    View in Google Scholar
  92. Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(10), 4035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104035
    View in Google Scholar
  93. Soldic-Aleksic, J., & Stankic, R. (2015). A comparative analysis of Serbia and the EU member states in the context of networked readiness index values. Economic Annals, 60(206), 45–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1506045S
    View in Google Scholar
  94. Sott, M. K., & Bender, M. S. (2025). The role of adaptive leadership in times of crisis: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Merits, 5(1), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/merits5010002
    View in Google Scholar
  95. Stefko, R., Frajtova Michalikova, K., Strakova, J., & Novak, A. (2025). Digital twin-based virtual factory and cyber-physical production systems, collaborative autonomous robotic and networked manufacturing technologies, and enterprise and business intelligence algorithms for industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(1), 389–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3557
    View in Google Scholar
  96. Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., & Marques, R. P. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of era 5.0 for a more humanistic and sustainable society—a literature review. Societies, 12(6), 149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060149
    View in Google Scholar
  97. Teixeira, J.E., & Tavares-Lehmann, A. T. C. P. (2022). Industry 4.0 in the European union: Policies and national strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121664
    View in Google Scholar
  98. Thompson, C. G., Kim, R. S., Aloe, A. M., & Becker, B. J. (2017). Extracting the variance inflation factor and other multicollinearity diagnostics from typical regression results. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(2), 81–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1277529
    View in Google Scholar
  99. Tokmergenova, M., & Dobos, I. (2024). Analysis of the Network Readiness Index (NRI) using multivariate statistics. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 32(1), 28–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.20548
    View in Google Scholar
  100. Toth, A., Nagy, L., Kennedy, R., Bohus, B., Abonyi, J., & Ruppert, T. (2023). The human-centric Industry 5.0 collaboration architecture. MethodsX, 11, 102260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102260
    View in Google Scholar
  101. Treuthart, M. P. (2019). Connectivity: The global gender digital divide and its implications for women's human rights and equality. Gonzaga Journal of International Law 23(1), 1–54.
    View in Google Scholar
  102. Tudose, M. B., Georgescu, A., & Avasilcăi, S. (2023). Global analysis regarding the impact of digital transformation on macroeconomic outcomes. Sustainability, 15(5), 4583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054583
    View in Google Scholar
  103. Turek, J., Ocicka, B., Rogowski, W., & Jefmański, B. (2023). The role of Industry 4.0 technologies in driving the financial importance of sustainability risk management. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 1009–1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.032
    View in Google Scholar
  104. Valaskova, K., Nagy, M., & Grecu, G. (2024). Digital twin simulation modeling, artificial intelligence-based Internet of Manufacturing Things systems, and virtual machine and cognitive computing algorithms in the Industry 4.0-based Slovak labor market. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(1), 95–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2814
    View in Google Scholar
  105. Van Niekerk, A. J. (2020). Inclusive economic sustainability: SDGs and global inequality. Sustainability, 12(13), 5427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135427
    View in Google Scholar
  106. Virglerova, Z., Homolka, L., Lazanyi, K., & Kliestik, T. (2017). Key determinants of the quality of business environment of SMEs in the Czech Republic. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 20(2), 87–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-2-007
    View in Google Scholar
  107. Wang, B., Zhou, H., Li, X., Yang, G., Zheng, P., Song, C., Yuan, Y., Wuest, T., Yang, H., & Wang, L. (2024). Human digital twin in the context of Industry 5.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 85, 102626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102626
    View in Google Scholar
  108. Webb, A., McQuaid, R. W., & Webster, C. W. R. (2021). Moving learning online and the COVID-19 pandemic: A university response. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 18(1), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-11-2020-0090
    View in Google Scholar
  109. Wenyang, D., Zhang, Y., & Dzhamankulov, B. (2024). The Impact of economic growth and foreign investment on the advancement of e-commerce. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(4), 112–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n4a1024
    View in Google Scholar
  110. Zafar, M. H., Langås, E. F., & Sanfilippo, F. (2024). Exploring the synergies between collaborative robotics, digital twins, augmentation, and industry 5.0 for smart manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 89, 102769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102769
    View in Google Scholar
  111. Zaki, M. (2019). Digital transformation: Harnessing digital technologies for the next generation of services. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 429–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0034
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 423

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)