EU decarbonization and industrial export competitiveness in a small open economy: A surprising resilience
Abstract
Research background: The competitiveness of the EU and its position in international trade have declined significantly, while the massive, unprecedented decarbonization of European industry has brought another challenge. Examining the impact of strict European decarbonization on the export competitiveness of European producers is not only a necessary indicator for setting appropriate policy design, but also a useful lesson for other countries in the fight against the climate crisis through proper policies.
Purpose of the article: This study evaluates the impact of stringent decarbonization on the export competitiveness of industrial producers within a small open economy, using Slovakia as a representative case study. Specifically, the authors analyse the effects of substantial renewable energy sources (RES) financing—mediated through feed-in tariffs—and investigate the causal relationship between export dynamics and higher electricity bills.
Methods: Based on data from Eurostat (energy prices, value-added) and Prodcom (export flows), the authors examine the impact of EU decarbonization measures on the competitiveness of Slovak industrial exporters within energy-intensive industries using Error Correction Models (ECM).
Findings & value added: In their research, the authors did not confirm the negative impact of decarbonization in a small open economy on the export of energy-intensive products. Among several factors explaining the finding, the Porter Hypothesis might be a possible explanation. The authors identified imported capital (investment) goods containing innovative technologies from multinational companies as a possible dominant factor. Finally, demanding decarbonization policies might not automatically be harmful to the internal and external competitiveness of domestic companies. Innovation policies and targeted stimulation measures (incentives and foreign trade measures) can be prerequisites for maintaining export competitiveness of industrial production. These findings from Slovakia serve as a useful representative case for the design of decarbonization policies—particularly in export-oriented countries implementing feed-in tariffs to support RES—and may guide managerial decisions in companies within energy-intensive industries in the CEE region and in a broader international context.
Keywords
decarbonization, electricity prices, export competitiveness, Porter effect
References
- Aichele, R., & Felbermayr, G. (2013). The effect of the Kyoto Protocol on carbon emissions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 731–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21720
View in Google Scholar - Aldy, J. E., & Pizer, W. A. (2015). The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation policies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(4), 565–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/683305
View in Google Scholar - Alolo, M., Azevedo, A., & El Kalak, I. (2020). The effect of the feed-in-system policy on renewable energy investments: Evidence from the EU countries. Energy Economics, 92, 104998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104998
View in Google Scholar - Bag, S. (2024). From resources to sustainability: A practice-based view of net zero economy implementation in small and medium business-to-business firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(6), 1876–1894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2023-0056
View in Google Scholar - Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, H. K. (2004). The J-Curve: A literature review. Applied Economics, 36(13), 1377–1398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000201794
View in Google Scholar - Bai, D., Du, L., Xu, Y., & Abbas, S. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and corporate green innovation: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed industrial corporations. Energy Economics, 127, 107020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107020
View in Google Scholar - Baláž, P., & Bayer, J. (2019). Energy prices and their impact on the competitiveness of the EU steel industry. Prague Economic Papers, 28(5), 547–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.715
View in Google Scholar - Baláž, P., & Hamara, A. (2016). Analysis of the Slovak export dependency on the economic development of Germany. Politická ekonomie, 64(5), 573–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1088
View in Google Scholar - Balcerzak, A. P., Uddin, G. S., Igliński, B., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2023). Global energy transition: From the main determinants to economic challenges. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 597–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.018
View in Google Scholar - Begovic, S., & Kreso, S. (2017). The adverse effect of real effective exchange rate change on trade balance in European transition countries. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 35(2), 277–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2017.2.277
View in Google Scholar - Blanchard, O. (2000). What do we know about macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell did not? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1375–1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554999
View in Google Scholar - Böhringer, C., García-Muros, X., & González-Eguino, M. (2022). Who bears the burden of greening electricity? Energy Economics, 105, 105705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105705
View in Google Scholar - Bureau, D., Fontagné, L., & Martin, P. (2013). Energy and competitiveness. Les notes du conseil d’analyse économique, 6(6), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ncae.006.0001
View in Google Scholar - Cambridge Econometrics. (2018). Study on energy prices, costs and subsidies and their impact on industry and households. Brussels: European Commission.
View in Google Scholar - Černá, I., Éltető, A., Folfas, P., Kuźnar, A., Křenková, E., Minárik, M., Przeździecka, E., Szalavetz, A., Túry, G., & Zábojník, S. (2022). GVCs in Central Europe: A perspective of the automotive sector after COVID-19. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
View in Google Scholar - Chang, S. C. (2010). Effects of asymmetric adjustment among labor productivity, labor demand, and exchange rate using threshold cointegration test. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 46(6), 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X460604
View in Google Scholar - Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., & Okubo, T. (2014). International environmental outsourcing. Review of World Economics, 150(4), 639–664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-014-0193-6
View in Google Scholar - Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1), 132–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.004
View in Google Scholar - Davies, H., & Green, D. (2010). Banking on the future: The fall and rise of central banking. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834631
View in Google Scholar - Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013
View in Google Scholar - Dechezleprêtre, A., Gennaioli, C., Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Stoerk, T. (2022). Searching for carbon leaks in multinational companies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 112, 102601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102601
View in Google Scholar - Draghi, M. (2024). The future of European competitiveness—A competitiveness strategy for Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
View in Google Scholar - Dvorsky, J., Kliestik, T., Cepel, M., & Strnad, Z. (2020). The influence of some factors of competitiveness on business risks. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(5), 1451–1465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13440
View in Google Scholar - Ekanayake, E. M., & Dissanayake, A. (2022). Effects of real exchange rate volatility on trade: Empirical analysis of the United States exports to BRICS. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(2), 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020073
View in Google Scholar - Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Dynamic model specification with equilibrium constraints: Cointegration and error-correction. Econometrica, 55(3), 251–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
View in Google Scholar - European Commission. (2019). Fourth report on the state of the energy union. Brussels: European Commission.
View in Google Scholar - European Commission. (2021). Prodcom export-import database.
View in Google Scholar - European Parliament. (2016). Energy costs and EU´s industry competitiveness. J. L. Tafall: Public Hearing on Energy Costs and EU industry Competitiveness European Parliament.
View in Google Scholar - Eurostat. (2020). National energy balances.
View in Google Scholar - Eurostat. (2021). Gross value added by industry.
View in Google Scholar - Faiella, I., & Mistretta, A. (2020). Energy costs and competitiveness in Europe. Bank of Italy Temi di Discussione, (1259). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612802
View in Google Scholar - Faiella, I., & Mistretta, A. (2022). The net zero challenge for firms’ competitiveness. Environmental and Resource Economics, 83(1), 85–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00652-7
View in Google Scholar - Flues, F., & Lutz, B. J. (2015). Competitiveness impacts of the German electricity tax. OECD Environment Working Papers, 88.
View in Google Scholar - Forliano, C., Battisti, E., De Bernardi, P., & Kliestik, T. (2025). Mapping the greenwashing research landscape: A theoretical and field analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 3407–3456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00856-3
View in Google Scholar - França, A., López-Manuel, L., Sartal, A., & Vázquez, X. H. (2023). Adapting corporations to climate change: How decarbonization impacts the business strategy–performance nexus. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5615–5632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3439
View in Google Scholar - Fraser Institute. (2021). Economic freedom of the world: 2021 annual report.
View in Google Scholar - Gandolfo, G. (1986). International economics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07976-8
View in Google Scholar - García-Álvarez, M. T., Cabeza-García, L., & Soares, I. (2017). Analysis of the promotion of onshore wind energy in the EU: Feed-in tariff or renewable portfolio standard? Renewable Energy, 111, 256–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.067
View in Google Scholar - Ghatak, S., & Siddiki, J. U. (2001). The use of the ARDL approach to cointegration for testing the J-curve phenomenon. Japan and the World Economy, 13(2), 215–230.
View in Google Scholar - Ghosh, A., Qureshi, M., & Tsangarides, C. (2014). The cost of tying one’s hands. Finance & Development, 51(2), 42–46.
View in Google Scholar - Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7
View in Google Scholar - Haluška, J. (2020). Industrial performance after the entry of Slovakia into the EU: Analysis and modelling based on cointegration. Bratislava: Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic.
View in Google Scholar - Haug, A. A. (2002). Testing for cointegration for the I(1) hypothesis. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 222(2), 173–193.
View in Google Scholar - International Energy Agency (IEA). (2014). World energy outlook 2014. Paris: OECD/IEA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/weo-2014-en
View in Google Scholar - International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). Description labour productivity.
View in Google Scholar - Jiang, S., Mentel, G., Shahzadi, I., Jebli, M. B., & Iqbal, N. (2022). Renewable energy, trade diversification and environmental footprints: Evidence for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Renewable Energy, 187, 874–886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.134
View in Google Scholar - Kaltenegger, O., Löschel, A., Baikowski, M., & Lingens, J. (2017). Energy costs in Germany and Europe: An assessment based on a (total real unit) energy cost accounting framework. Energy Policy, 104, 419–430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.039
View in Google Scholar - Kordalska, A., & Olczyk, M. (2021). New patterns in the position of CEE countries in global value chains: Functional specialisation approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 35–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.002
View in Google Scholar - Korsakiene, R., Tvaronavičiene, R., & Smaliukiene, R. (2014). Impact of energy prices on industrial sector development and export: Lithuania in the context of Baltic States. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 461–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.890
View in Google Scholar - Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2014). Empirical evidence on the effects of environmental policy stringency on productivity growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1179.
View in Google Scholar - Kpodar, M. K. R., Fabrizio, M. S., & Eklou, K. M. (2019). Export competitiveness-fuel price nexus in developing countries: Real or false concern? IMF Working Paper, 19/27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484387771.001
View in Google Scholar - Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2000). International economics: Theory and policy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
View in Google Scholar - Kumar, S., & Prabhakar, P. (2020). Industrial energy prices and export competitiveness: Evidence from India. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 22, 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-019-00244-8
View in Google Scholar - Lee, J. W. (1994). Capital goods imports and long-run growth. NBER Working Paper, 4725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4725
View in Google Scholar - Li, S., & Ni, J. (2016). A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning-by-doing. Economics Letters, 145, 104–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.05.031
View in Google Scholar - Lin, B., & Zhao, H. (2023). Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Evidence from China's futures market. Energy Policy, 177, 113573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113573
View in Google Scholar - Lindén, A. J. (2017). Unit energy costs in Europe, member states and international partners. Brussels: European Commission.
View in Google Scholar - Liu, Q., & Fang, D. (2025). Deceptive greenwashing by retail electricity providers under renewable portfolio standards: The impact of market transparency. Energy Policy, 202, 114591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114591
View in Google Scholar - Loayza, N., & Ranciere, R. (2005). Financial development, financial fragility, and growth. IMF Working Paper, WP/05/170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451861891.001
View in Google Scholar - Locmelis, K., & Blumberg, D. (2019). Energy taxation exemptions for energy intensive industries and its impact on energy efficiency in Latvia. In 2019 IEEE 60th international scientific conference on power and electrical engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RTUCON48111.2019.8982313
View in Google Scholar - Lukáčik, M., Lukáčiková, A., & Szomolányi, K. (2011). Econometric modelling in Eviews and Gretl software. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
View in Google Scholar - Lyon, T. P. (2016). Drivers and impacts of renewable portfolio standards. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 8, 141–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095432
View in Google Scholar - Ma, X., Pan, Y., Zhang, M., Ma, J., & Yang, W. (2024). Impact of carbon emission trading and renewable energy development policy on the sustainability of electricity market: A Stackelberg game analysis. Energy Economics, 129, 107199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107199
View in Google Scholar - Mah, J. S. (2000). An empirical examination of the disaggregated import demand of Korea. Journal of Asian Economics, 11(2), 237–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(00)00053-1
View in Google Scholar - Martin, R., Muûls, M., de Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014). Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU emissions trading scheme. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2482–2508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2482
View in Google Scholar - McKinnon, R. (1963). Optimum currency area. American Economic Review, 53(4), 717–725.
View in Google Scholar - Misch, F., & Wingender, M. P. (2021). Revisiting carbon leakage. IMF Working Paper, 2021/207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513593029.001
View in Google Scholar - Mnatsakanyan, R. (2017). Imports of capital goods as a source of the technological change and long-run growth in emerging economies: The case of Armenia. Central Bank of Armenia Working Paper, 2017/01.
View in Google Scholar - Motta, M., & Peitz, M. (2023). State aid in times of crisis. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 14(1), 1–2.
View in Google Scholar - Mottaleb, K. A., & Durand-Morat, A. (2024). Interrelationships among the rice export prices of major exporting countries: In search of the leader and followers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 56(2), 234–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2024.7
View in Google Scholar - Naegele, H., & Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.004
View in Google Scholar - Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103
View in Google Scholar - National Research Council. (2011). Limiting the magnitude of future climate change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
View in Google Scholar - NBS (National Bank of Slovakia). (2011). Methodology of the exchange rate calculation in NBS. Biatec, 19(3).
View in Google Scholar - NBS (National Bank of Slovakia). (2017). Position of Slovakia in the European and global value chains. Biatec, 25(3).
View in Google Scholar - Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1996). Foundations of international macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar - Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. (2014). Costs, competitiveness and climate policy: Distortions across Europe. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
View in Google Scholar - Panta, H., Devkota, M. L., & Banjade, D. (2022). Exports and imports-led growth: Evidence from a small developing economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010011
View in Google Scholar - Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
View in Google Scholar - Randveer, M. (2002). Aspects of the sustainability of Estonian currency board arrangement. Tallinn: Bank of Estonia.
View in Google Scholar - Rodrik, D. (2008). The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 365–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0020
View in Google Scholar - Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
View in Google Scholar - Sankaran, A., Kumar, S., Arjun, K., & Das, M. (2019). Estimating the causal relationship between electricity consumption and industrial output: ARDL bounds and Toda-Yamamoto approaches for ten late industrialized countries. Heliyon, 5(6), e01904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01904
View in Google Scholar - Saqib, N., Ozturk, I., Usman, M., Sharif, A., & Razzaq, A. (2023). Pollution haven or halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint. Gondwana Research, 116, 136–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.12.018
View in Google Scholar - Sato, M., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2015). Asymmetric industrial energy prices and international trade. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper, 202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.020
View in Google Scholar - Senadheera, Y. (2015). Impact of the effective exchange rate on the trade balance of Sri Lanka: Evidence from 2000 to 2013. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 9(2), 93–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801014568146
View in Google Scholar - Shahbaz, M., Topcu, B. A., Sarıgül, S. S., & Doğan, M. (2023). Energy imports as inhibitor of economic growth: The role of impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(4), 497–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2237131
View in Google Scholar - Song, Y., Du, C., Du, P., Liu, R., & Lu, Z. (2024). Digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123159
View in Google Scholar - Statistisches Bundesamt. (2022). Consumer price index.
View in Google Scholar - Stöllinger, R., Hanzl-Weiss, D., Leitner, S. M., & Stehrer, R. (2018). Global value chains and structural upgrading. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Research Report, 429.
View in Google Scholar - Taušer, J., Arltová, M., & Žamberský, P. (2015). Czech exports and German GDP: A closer look. Prague Economic Papers, 24(1), 17–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.498
View in Google Scholar - Tian, J., Sun, S., Cao, W., Bu, D., & Xue, R. (2024). Make every dollar count: The impact of green credit regulation on corporate green investment efficiency. Energy Economics, 130, 107307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107307
View in Google Scholar - van den Berg, M., & van Marrewijk, C. (2017). Imports and productivity: The impact of geography and factor intensity. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(4), 425–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2016.1263359
View in Google Scholar - Vetsikas, A., & Stamboulis, Y. (2023). Does innovation activity affect trade openness? An ARDL bounds testing approach for 10 European countries. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 32(1), 163–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2080855
View in Google Scholar - Wang, M. L. (2023). Effects of the green finance policy on the green innovation efficiency of the manufacturing industry: A difference-in-difference model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122333
View in Google Scholar - Youssef Ben, S. (2023). The relationships between renewable energy, net energy imports, arms exports, military expenditures, and CO₂ emissions in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(30), 75369–75381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27649-z
View in Google Scholar - Yu, B., Fang, D., Xiao, K., & Pan, Y. (2023). Drivers of renewable energy penetration and its role in power sector's deep decarbonization towards carbon peak. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113247
View in Google Scholar - Zabojnik, S., Steinhauser, D., & Kráľ, P. (2022). E-mobility in Slovakia by 2030—End of oil dependency? IET Smart Cities, 4(2), 127–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.12031
View in Google Scholar - Zabojnik, S., Steinhauser, D., & Peštová, V. (2023). EU decarbonization: Do EU electricity costs harm export competitiveness? Amfiteatru Economic, 25(63), 522–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/63/522
View in Google Scholar - Zhou, Y., Zhou, W., & Wei, C. (2023). Environmental performance of the Chinese cement enterprise: An empirical analysis using a text-based directional vector. Energy Economics, 125, 106845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106845
View in Google Scholar