Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Process and product innovations, multi-product status and export performance: firm-level evidence from V?4 countries

Abstract

Research background: In this paper, we study empirically the relationship between different forms of innovations, multi-product status and export performance of firms from four Visegrad countries. We treat innovations as the key element that can increase the level of firm productivity.

Purpose of the article: The main objective is to analyze the empirical relationship between different firms of innovation of firms from Visegrad countries and their export performance. In contrast to previous studies that use R&D spending as a measure of innovation, we rather relay on innovation outcomes. Our detailed hypotheses postulate the existence of positive relationships between firm export performance and different forms of innovation. We seek to determine which type of innovation activity is of the greatest importance for exporting and whether it depends on firm size, the level of internationalization, the use of human capital and its sector of activity. In addition, we control for the multi-product status of firms, i.e. whether they sell one or many products.

Methods: The measures of innovative activity of companies include both spending on R&D as well as its effects, such as product and process innovations. In addition, we control for the multi-product status measured by the share of the main product in total sales of the firm, as well as for other firm-level characteristics. The empirical implementation of the theoretical framework is based on the probit models, applied to the fifth edition of BEEPS firm level data set covering the period 2011?2014.

Findings & Value added: Our results indicate that the probability of exporting is positively related to both product and process innovations and the multi-product status. In addition, we find that the probability of exporting is related to the set of control variables including labor productivity, firm size, the share of university graduates in productive employment, foreign capital participation and the use of foreign licenses.

Keywords

export activity, firm heterogeneity, process and product innovations, multi-product status, Visegrad countries

PDF

References

  1. Allanson, P., & Montagna C. (2005). Multiproduct firms and market structure: an explorative application to the product life cycle. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(7–8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.02.001
    View in Google Scholar
  2. Atkeson A, & Burstein A. (2007). Innovation, firm dynamics, and international trade. NBER Working Paper, 13326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13326
    View in Google Scholar
  3. Becker, S. O. & Egger, P. H. (2013). Endogenous product versus process innovation and a firm’s propensity to export. Empirical Economics, 44(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0322-6
    View in Google Scholar
  4. Békés, G., Muraközy, B., & Harasztosi, P., (2011). Firms and products in international trade: Evidence from Hungary. Economic Systems, 35(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.11.005
    View in Google Scholar
  5. Békés, G., Muraközy, B. (2012). Temporary trade and heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics, 87(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.12.007
    View in Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, A., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional export performance: cause, effect, or both?. Journal of International Economics, 47(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00027-0
    View in Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2010). Multiple-product firms and product switching. American Economic Review, 100(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.70
    View in Google Scholar
  8. Brodzicki, T. (2016). Innovation intensity as a driver of firm’s internationalization intensity. Evidence for Poland. Ekonomia, Rynek, Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, 46.
    View in Google Scholar
  9. Brodzicki, T., (2017). Internationalisation and innovation intensities of Polish manufacturing firms: a close nexus? Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(1). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050106
    View in Google Scholar
  10. Brodzicki, T., & Ciołek, D. (2016). Determinanty działalności eksportowej polskich firm produkcyjnych. Gospodarka Narodowa, 86/87(2).
    View in Google Scholar
  11. Caldera, A. (2010). Innovation and exporting: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Review of World Economy, 146(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0065-7
    View in Google Scholar
  12. Cassiman, B., Golovko, E., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2010). Innovation, exports and productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.03.005
    View in Google Scholar
  13. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J., & Michałek, A. (2012a). Determinanty działalności eksportowej polskich przedsiębiorstw. Gospodarka Narodowa, 80/81(7-8).
    View in Google Scholar
  14. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J., & Szczygielski, K. (2016). Innovations and export performance: firm-level evidence from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050205.
    View in Google Scholar
  15. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J. (2016). Innowacje a działalność eksportowa polskich przedsiębiorstw. International Business and Global Economy, 2(2). Doi: 10.4467/23539496IB.16.067.5648.
    View in Google Scholar
  16. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J. (2017a). Innovations and export performance of new EU member states. Ekonomista, 5.
    View in Google Scholar
  17. Cieślik, A., & Michałek, J. (2017b). Innovation forms and firm export performance: empirical evidence from ECA countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(2). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2017.050205
    View in Google Scholar
  18. Cieślik, A., Michałek J., Michałek, A. (2012b). Export activity in Visegrad 4 countries: firm level investigation. Ekonomia, Rynek, Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, 30.
    View in Google Scholar
  19. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J., & Michałek, A. (2014). The influence of firm characteristics and export performance in Central and Eastern Europe: comparisons of Visegrad, Baltic and Caucasus States. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 2(1). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2014.020102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2014.020102
    View in Google Scholar
  20. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J., Michałek, A., & Mycielski, J. (2015). Determinants of export performance: comparison of Central European and Baltic firms. Finance a Uver, 65(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2015.026
    View in Google Scholar
  21. Cieślik, A., Michałek, J., & Szczygielski, K. (2016). Innovations and export performance: firm-level evidence from Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2016.040402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040402
    View in Google Scholar
  22. Constantini, J. A., & Melitz, M. J. (2008). The dynamics of firm-level adjustment to trade liberalization. In: E. Helpman, D. Marin, & T. Verdier (Eds.). The organization of firms in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    View in Google Scholar
  23. Costas, A., & Muendler, M. A. (2013). Exporters and their products: a collection of empirical regularities. CESifo Economic Studies, 59(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifs028
    View in Google Scholar
  24. Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, C., & Polanec, S. (2010). From innovation to exporting or vice versa? World Economy, 33(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01260.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01260.x
    View in Google Scholar
  25. Demidova, S., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2013). The simple analytics of the Melitz model in a small economy. Journal of International Economics, 90(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.02.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.02.006
    View in Google Scholar
  26. Ebling, G., & Janz, N. (1999). Export and innovation activities in the German service sector. Empirical evidence at the firm level. Zentrum fur Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung. ZEW discussion paper. 99–53.
    View in Google Scholar
  27. Gkypali, A., Rafailidis, A., & Tsekouras, K. (2015). Innovation and export performance: do young and mature innovative firms differ?. Eurasian Business Review, 5(2). doi: 10.1007/s40821-015-0030-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0030-4
    View in Google Scholar
  28. Jung, B. (2012). Optimal fixed cost subsidies in Melitz-type models. Empirica, 39(1). doi: 10.1007/s10663-010-9165-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-010-9165-9
    View in Google Scholar
  29. Lachenmaier, S., & Wößmann, L. W. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi043
    View in Google Scholar
  30. Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.). Economics of innovations, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w15857
    View in Google Scholar
  31. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6). doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.0046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
    View in Google Scholar
  32. Melitz, M. J., & Ottaviano, G. (2008). Market size, trade, and productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 75(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x
    View in Google Scholar
  33. Redding, S. J., & Melitz, M. J. (2014). Heterogeneous firms and trade. Handbook of International Economics, 4.
    View in Google Scholar
  34. Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2002). Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants. Research Policy, 31(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00175-5
    View in Google Scholar
  35. Van Beveren, I., & Vandenbussche, H. (2010). Product and process innovation and firms' decision to export. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870903546267
    View in Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. World Economy, 30(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00872.x
    View in Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economy, 148(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0116-8
    View in Google Scholar
  38. Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7–8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00051-6
    View in Google Scholar

Similar Articles

1-10 of 370

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>